linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix randomized task_struct
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:55:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170630155513.GA4902@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9291740E-3BD1-454C-A3EB-46E35F073D0E@linaro.org>

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 03:49:41PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 30 Jun 2017, at 15:34, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > 
> > With the new task struct randomization, we can run into a build
> > failure for certain random seeds:
> > 
> > arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S: Assembler messages:
> > arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:803: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4096)
> > 
> > Only two constants in asm-offset.h are affected, and I'm changing
> > both of them here to work correctly in all configurations.
> > 
> > One more macro has the problem, but is currently unused, so this
> > removes it instead of adding complexity.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > Fixes: c33d8b12fbbd ("task_struct: Allow randomized layout")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S |  5 ++++-
> > arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S    | 10 ++++------
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > index 9f157e7c51e7..db6d22b23bd8 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > @@ -797,7 +797,10 @@ ENTRY(__switch_to)
> > #if defined(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> >    ldr    r7, [r2, #TI_TASK]
> >    ldr    r8, =__stack_chk_guard
> > -    ldr    r7, [r7, #TSK_STACK_CANARY]
> > +    .if (TSK_STACK_CANARY > PAGE_MASK)
> 
> Shouldn't this be ~PAGE_MASK?
> 
> I think 
> 
> .if (TSK_STACK_CANARY & PAGE_MASK) != 0
> 
> is better and clearer as well

It's not really that much clearer - what has any of this got to do with
the size of a page?  Just because a definition appears to be numerically
the same, it doesn't mean it should be used!

The LDR instruction takes a maximum of a 12-bit constant.  This 12-bit
constant has nothing to do with the page size; it's been that way since
the early ARMs that knew nothing about page tables.

Please instead create a LDR_IMM12_MASK or similar definition for this.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-30 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-30 15:34 [PATCH] ARM: fix randomized task_struct Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-30 15:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-30 15:55   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-06-30 17:34     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-30 15:55   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170630155513.GA4902@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).