From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 09:52:34 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] some fixups for MediaTek cpufreq driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20170705042234.GL3532@vireshk-i7> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05-07-17, 02:55, sean.wang at mediatek.com wrote: > From: Sean Wang > > Changes since v1: > - drop those patches already accepted > - refine the commit messages and Kconfig dependency > - Kconfig menu entry and file name itself are updated with more > generic name to drop "MT8173" since this driver actually supports > all MediaTek SoCs. > - generate patchset again with git format-patch -C -M --thread=shallow > - fix binding examples by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will > never have a "reg" property. > > Hi, > > The purpose of the series is > - (patch 1 to 3) to fix up current Mediatek cpufreq driver > can't work with the latest tree since one required CPU clock muxer missing > would cause the driver getting the resource fails when driver probe gets > called. > - (patch 4) to enable cpufreq feature on MT2701/MT7623 platform. > - (patch 5 to 6) to update the binding document to reflect > latest driver logic and add more examples guiding people how to apply for > Mediatek cpufreq driver. > > Sean Wang (3): > cpufreq: mediatek: Add support of cpufreq to MT2701/MT7623 SoC > dt-bindings: cpufreq: move MediaTek cpufreq dt-bindings document to > proper place > dt-bindings: cpufreq: enhance MediaTek cpufreq dt-binding document Just a minor comment on 3/3. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar -- viresh