From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:21:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v9 2/3] PCI: Add tango PCIe host bridge support In-Reply-To: <0cd65cda-9a3d-8c1b-1ee9-c48f63959140@free.fr> References: <987fac41-80dc-f1d0-ec0b-91ae57b91bfd@sigmadesigns.com> <20170702231811.GJ18324@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <79382219-c730-da78-3e5f-5abf3173d7ac@sigmadesigns.com> <20170703134031.GG13824@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <20170703181128.GD4902@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <0cd65cda-9a3d-8c1b-1ee9-c48f63959140@free.fr> Message-ID: <20170705052148.GA6213@kroah.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 01:59:55AM +0200, Mason wrote: > Do larger SoC vendors have HW devs working closely with > Linux devs, to avoid these design bloopers? Yes they generally do, as they have learned from their prior mistakes :) good luck! greg k-h