From: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org (Bjorn Andersson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add remote processor coredump support
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:28:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170712232833.GI20973@minitux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c2fe4e0-2aee-fcf4-0a49-5651241e1f9e@ti.com>
On Thu 15 Jun 11:48 PDT 2017, Suman Anna wrote:
[..]
> > +static int rproc_coredump_add_header(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc_dump_segment *entry;
> > + struct elf32_phdr *phdr;
> > + struct elf32_hdr *ehdr;
> > + int nsegments = 0;
> > + size_t offset;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(entry, &rproc->dump_segments, node)
> > + nsegments++;
> > +
> > + rproc->dump_header_size = sizeof(*ehdr) + sizeof(*phdr) * nsegments;
> > + ehdr = kzalloc(rproc->dump_header_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + rproc->dump_header = (char *)ehdr;
> > + if (!rproc->dump_header)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + memcpy(ehdr->e_ident, ELFMAG, SELFMAG);
> > + ehdr->e_ident[EI_CLASS] = ELFCLASS32;
> > + ehdr->e_ident[EI_DATA] = ELFDATA2LSB;
> > + ehdr->e_ident[EI_VERSION] = EV_CURRENT;
> > + ehdr->e_ident[EI_OSABI] = ELFOSABI_NONE;
> > + ehdr->e_type = ET_CORE;
> > + ehdr->e_version = EV_CURRENT;
> > + ehdr->e_phoff = sizeof(*ehdr);
> > + ehdr->e_ehsize = sizeof(*ehdr);
> > + ehdr->e_phentsize = sizeof(*phdr);
> > + ehdr->e_phnum = nsegments;
> > +
[..]
>
> This is not generic, remoteproc core can support non-ELF images, and the
> choice of fw_ops is left to individual platform drivers. The dump logic is
> dependent on the particular format being used, and so whatever ELF coredump
> support you are adding should be added through a fw_ops. You can add a
> default one for regular ELFs, and platform drivers can always customized
> based on thier own fw_ops.
>
I do not see the need for the coredump file format to match the firmware
file format.
There are a few cases where the remoteproc driver slaps a single raw
blob into a single memory location and adding a single-segment ELF
header to this might be considered overkill, but in the generic case we
have some number of chunks loaded into some number of memory regions and
ELF is a reasonable representation of this list.
The purpose of the output is to be loaded in a debugger and I think ELF
is a sane generic option for this.
Perhaps we're missing some data/information by selecting ELF as
container format?
Regards,
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-12 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-14 18:06 [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add remote processor coredump support Sarangdhar Joshi
2017-06-14 18:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: qcom: Register segments with remoteproc Sarangdhar Joshi
2017-06-15 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add remote processor coredump support Suman Anna
2017-06-15 23:11 ` Sarangdhar Joshi
2017-06-21 20:54 ` Suman Anna
2017-07-07 0:02 ` Sarangdhar Joshi
2017-07-12 23:47 ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-07-12 23:28 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2017-07-12 23:14 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170712232833.GI20973@minitux \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).