[PATCH v4 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek: Add support of cpufreq to MT2701/MT7623 SoC

Viresh Kumar
2017-07-13T03:16:14Z

On 12-07-17, 16:50, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> Hi Eddie,
>
> On 07/11/2017 04:49 AM, Eddie Huang wrote:
> >Hi Sean,
> >
> >On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 22:23 +0800, sean.wang at mediatek.com wrote:
> >>From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> >>
> >>MT2701/MT7623 is a 32-bit ARMv7 based quad-core (4 * Cortex-A7) with
> >>single cluster and this hardware is also compatible with the existing
> >>driver through enabling CPU frequency feature with operating-points-v2
> >>bindings. Also, this driver actually supports all MediaTek SoCs, the
> >>Kconfig menu entry and file name itself should be updated with more
> >>generic name to drop "MT8173"
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> >>Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> >>Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> >>---
> >> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 7 +++----
> >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 2 +-
> >> drivers/cpufreq/{mt8173-cpufreq.c => mediatek-cpufreq.c} | 2 ++
> >> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >> rename drivers/cpufreq/{mt8173-cpufreq.c => mediatek-cpufreq.c} (99%)
> >>
> >
> >As Viresh mentioned, there are already many drivers use "mtk" as

Do you have a link to when I mentioned this?

/me suffering from Amnesia ? :)

> >filename prefix or postfix.To align with those files, I suggest use
> >mtk-cpufreq.c.I think there are not too many values to change all "mtk-"
> >to "mediatek-", but it is worth to have the same naming rule for
> >mediatek upstream driver.
> >
>
> In the last submission Jean proposed to change all file names from
> mtk-*.[ch] to mediatek-*.[ch] as this will cause less confusion.
>
> Viresh are you OK with that approach or do you prefer that we stay with mtk
> prefix? I think it makes sense to have a unique prefix and resolve the
> situation we now have with source files and Kconfig options.
> But TBH I have no strong feeling for any of the two prefixes.

I am fine with both. Maybe don't resend for just that, mediatek
doesn't sound any bad.

--
viresh