public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: Acknowledge completion queue on each iteration
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:56:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170717225615.GB1496@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d10032c-35ec-978c-6b8f-1ab9c07adf7f@codeaurora.org>

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:46:11PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Hi Keith,
> 
> On 7/17/2017 6:45 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:36:23PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >> Code is moving the completion queue doorbell after processing all completed
> >> events and sending callbacks to the block layer on each iteration.
> >>
> >> This is causing a performance drop when a lot of jobs are queued towards
> >> the HW. Move the completion queue doorbell on each loop instead and allow new
> >> jobs to be queued by the HW.
> > 
> > That doesn't make sense. Aggregating doorbell writes should be much more
> > efficient for high depth workloads.
> > 
> 
> Problem is that code is throttling the HW as HW cannot queue more completions until
> SW get a chance to clear it. 
> 
> As an example:
> 
> for each in N
> (
> 	blk_layer()
> )
> ring door bell
> 
> HW cannot queue new job until N x blk_layer operations are processed and queue
> element ownership is passed to the HW after the loop. HW is just sitting idle
> there if no queue entries are available.

If no completion queue entries are available, then there can't possibly
be any submission queue entries for the HW to work on either.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-17 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-17 22:36 [PATCH] nvme: Acknowledge completion queue on each iteration Sinan Kaya
2017-07-17 22:45 ` Keith Busch
2017-07-17 22:46   ` Sinan Kaya
2017-07-17 22:56     ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-07-17 23:07       ` okaya at codeaurora.org
2017-07-18 14:36         ` Keith Busch
2017-07-18 18:52           ` Sinan Kaya
2017-07-18 21:26             ` Keith Busch
2017-07-19  9:20 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-19 10:37   ` Sinan Kaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170717225615.GB1496@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox