linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] iommu: Add capability IOMMU_CAP_BYPASS
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:30:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170719113017.GH13642@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAALAos8nf-d5i74J7-sAJb2o9eFj2PVDeLLVd=wun+gW1ihXSA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:56:38PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:49:00PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> >> > On 19/07/17 10:33, Anup Patel wrote:
> >> >> Some of the IOMMUs (such as ARM SMMU) are capable of bypassing
> >> >> transactions for which no IOMMU domain is configured.
> >> >>
> >> >> This patch adds IOMMU_CAP_BYPASS which can be used by IOMMU
> >> >> drivers to advertise transation bypass capability of an IOMMU.
> >> >
> >> > Whatever the intended semantics of this are, I can't help thinking it
> >> > would be better served by allowing callers to explicitly allocate their
> >> > own IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY domains. That would also be useful for the
> >> > problem we have with legacy virtio devices behind real IOMMUs.
> >>
> >> We want to use VFIO no-IOMMU mode for FlexRM device but
> >> currently it does not allow on our SOC because IOMMU ops are
> >> registered for platform bus.
> >
> > Why do you want to use no-IOMMU mode if you have an IOMMU, and why you do
> > think the individual IOMMU drivers are the place to implement this?
> >
> > NAK to the SMMU patches, for the reasons outlined by Robin.
> 
> We have limited number of SMRs on our SOC.
> 
> There are lot of devices for which we can potentially
> configure SMMU but then due to limited number of
> SMRs so we use SMMU only for certain devices.
> 
> For FlexRM device on our SOC, we don't intend to
> use SMMU hence we need VFIO no-IOMMU mode
> working for FlexRM device on our SOC.
> 
> Please re-consider your NAK.

I'm afraid it still stands for the current implementation. If you can't
solve the SMR restriction by grouping things appropriately (which would be
my strong preference), then I think you'll have to follow-up on Robin's
suggestion of implementing support for IDENTITY domains in VFIO for no-IOMMU
mode to be used even when an IOMMU is present.

Will

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-19 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-19  9:33 [PATCH 0/5] FlexRM support in VFIO platform Anup Patel
2017-07-19  9:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu: Add capability IOMMU_CAP_BYPASS Anup Patel
2017-07-19 10:58   ` Robin Murphy
2017-07-19 11:19     ` Anup Patel
2017-07-19 11:23       ` Will Deacon
2017-07-19 11:26         ` Anup Patel
2017-07-19 11:29           ` Robin Murphy
2017-07-19 11:30           ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-07-19 11:33             ` Anup Patel
2017-07-19  9:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add IOMMU_CAP_BYPASS to the ARM SMMU driver Anup Patel
2017-07-19 10:59   ` Robin Murphy
2017-07-19  9:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: add IOMMU_CAP_BYPASS to the ARM SMMUv3 driver Anup Patel
2017-07-19 11:00   ` Robin Murphy
2017-07-19 11:23     ` Anup Patel
2017-07-19 11:25       ` Will Deacon
2017-07-19 11:31         ` Anup Patel
2017-07-19 11:33           ` Will Deacon
2017-07-19 11:39             ` Anup Patel
2017-07-19 11:53               ` Will Deacon
2017-07-20  4:02                 ` Anup Patel
2017-07-20  9:10                   ` Will Deacon
2017-07-20 11:08                     ` Anup Patel
2017-07-20 11:17                       ` Will Deacon
2017-07-20 11:17                     ` Robin Murphy
2017-07-24 17:16                       ` Alex Williamson
2017-07-24 17:23                         ` Robin Murphy
2017-07-24 19:06                           ` Alex Williamson
2017-07-25  8:59                             ` Anup Patel
2017-07-19  9:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] vfio: Allow No-IOMMU mode for IOMMUs with bypass capability Anup Patel
2017-07-19  9:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] vfio: platform: reset: Add Broadcom FlexRM reset module Anup Patel
2017-07-19 16:50   ` Scott Branden
2017-07-20  4:05     ` Anup Patel
2017-07-19 10:57 ` [PATCH 0/5] FlexRM support in VFIO platform Robin Murphy
2017-07-19 11:17   ` Anup Patel
2017-07-19 11:25     ` Robin Murphy
2017-07-19 11:28       ` Anup Patel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170719113017.GH13642@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).