From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:12:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v6 0/6] provide power off support for iMX6 with external PMIC In-Reply-To: <20170720123701.d5zyhbevyic3odxk@sirena.org.uk> References: <20170620140910.7568-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20170720123701.d5zyhbevyic3odxk@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <20170720131212.GZ31807@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 01:37:01PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 06:53:54AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > Hallo all, > > > > Here Gentle Ping to the Old King > > > > DT is already ACKed. > > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. > > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches > anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in > doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. It also doesn't help that there's little context about who Oleksij is expecting a reply from. There's 11 individuals in the To: header. Is the reference above refering to me? Shrug, I don't know. I doubt it because I'm not maintaining the imx6 SoC support. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.