From: robert.richter@cavium.com (Robert Richter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] acpi/iort: numa: Add numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:13:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725151305.GU17961@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725050237.11033-1-ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>
On 25.07.17 10:32:37, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> ARM IORT specification(rev. C) has added provision to define proximity
> domain in SMMUv3 IORT table. Adding required code to parse Proximity
> domain and set numa_node of smmv3 platform devices.
>
> Add code to parse proximity domain in SMMUv3 IORT table to
> set numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>
> ---
>
> This patch has dependency on header file patch [1], which is
> already merged to linux-pm.
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=c944230064eb65e4fa018d86779b4fd200b1d7e7
>
> v4:
> - Fix compilation issue in !CONFIG_NUMA
>
> v3:
> - Addressed Lorenzo Pieralisi comment.
>
> v2:
> - Changed as per Lorenzo Pieralisi and Hanjun Guo suggestions.
>
> v1:
> - Initial patch
>
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index a3215ee..c5c82c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -908,6 +908,28 @@ static bool __init arm_smmu_v3_is_coherent(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> return smmu->flags & ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_COHACC_OVERRIDE;
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA) && (ACPI_CA_VERSION >= 0x20170629)
This acpica version check was very unhandy for backports when we did
this last time. If we backport just c944230064 and this single patch
it wont work as the version check prevents the code from being
enabled. Isn't there another way to handle cross tree dependencies of
pull requests? E.g. we could base this patch on acpica (ab539eaa50)
and remove the check.
Alternatively we could do in this case:
#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA) && defined(ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_PXM_VALID)
> +/*
> + * set numa proximity domain for smmuv3 device
> + */
> +static void __init arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *smmu;
> +
> + smmu = (struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *)node->node_data;
> + if (smmu->flags & ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_PXM_VALID) {
> + set_dev_node(dev, acpi_map_pxm_to_node(smmu->pxm));
> + pr_info("SMMUV3[%llx] Mapped to Proximity domain %d\n",
Better use dev_info() here.
> + smmu->base_address,
> + smmu->pxm);
> + }
> +}
> +#else
> +static void __init arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> + struct device *dev) { }
Just do:
#define arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity NULL
> +#endif
> +
> static int __init arm_smmu_count_resources(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> {
> struct acpi_iort_smmu *smmu;
> @@ -977,20 +999,24 @@ struct iort_iommu_config {
> int (*iommu_count_resources)(struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> void (*iommu_init_resources)(struct resource *res,
> struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> + void (*iommu_set_proximity)(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> + struct device *dev);
Wrt pseudo-OO programming this is more a method for struct dev than
node, so swap args: iommu_set_proximity(dev, node)
> };
>
> static const struct iort_iommu_config iort_arm_smmu_v3_cfg __initconst = {
> .name = "arm-smmu-v3",
> .iommu_is_coherent = arm_smmu_v3_is_coherent,
> .iommu_count_resources = arm_smmu_v3_count_resources,
> - .iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_v3_init_resources
> + .iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_v3_init_resources,
> + .iommu_set_proximity = arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity
Add comma at the end here.
> };
>
> static const struct iort_iommu_config iort_arm_smmu_cfg __initconst = {
> .name = "arm-smmu",
> .iommu_is_coherent = arm_smmu_is_coherent,
> .iommu_count_resources = arm_smmu_count_resources,
> - .iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_init_resources
> + .iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_init_resources,
> + .iommu_set_proximity = NULL
No need for null assignment.
-Robert
> };
>
> static __init
> @@ -1028,6 +1054,9 @@ static int __init iort_add_smmu_platform_device(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> if (!pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + if (ops->iommu_set_proximity)
> + ops->iommu_set_proximity(node, &pdev->dev);
> +
> count = ops->iommu_count_resources(node);
>
> r = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*r), GFP_KERNEL);
> --
> 2.9.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-25 5:02 [PATCH v4] acpi/iort: numa: Add numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-07-25 15:13 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2017-07-25 16:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-02 16:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-03 13:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-08-03 13:40 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-08-03 13:52 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-15 15:02 ` Robert Richter
2017-08-15 15:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-15 16:10 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170725151305.GU17961@rric.localdomain \
--to=robert.richter@cavium.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox