From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Paul E. McKenney) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:59:01 -0700 Subject: RCU lockup issues when CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR=n - any one else seeing this? In-Reply-To: <20170730133747.anusyacw2l5hhjgx@tardis> References: <20170727124913.GL3730@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170727144903.000022a1@huawei.com> <20170727173923.000001b2@huawei.com> <20170727165245.GD3730@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170728084411.00001ddb@huawei.com> <20170728125416.j7gcgvnxgv2gq73u@tardis> <20170728145530.GE3730@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170728184129.GA24364@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170728190956.GA26640@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170730133747.anusyacw2l5hhjgx@tardis> Message-ID: <20170730165901.GX3730@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:37:47PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:09:56PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:41:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 07:55:30AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:54:16PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > > > [ . . . ] > > > > > > Even though Jonathan's testing indicates that it didn't fix this > > > > particular problem: > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney > > > > > > And while we are at it: > > > > > > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney > > > > Not because it it fixed the TREE01 issue -- it did not. But as near > > as I can see, it didn't cause any additional issues. > > > > Understood. > > Still work on waketorture for a test case which could trigger this > problem in a real world. My old plan is to send this out when I could > use waketorture to show this patch actually resolves some potential > bugs, but just put it ahead here in case it may help. > > Will send it out with your Tested-by and Acked-by and continue to work > on waketorture. Sounds good! Given that Jonathan's traces didn't show a timer expiration, the problems might be in timers. Thanx, Paul