linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 31/38] KVM: arm64: Manage the shadow states when virtual E2H bit enabled
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:57:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170731095721.GR5176@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500397144-16232-32-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org>

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:58:57AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:

In the subject: s/virtual E2H bit enabled/virtual E2H bit is set/

> When creating the shadow context for the virtual EL2 execution, we can
> directly copy the EL2 register states to the shadow EL1 register states
> if the virtual HCR_EL2.E2H bit is set. This is because EL1 and EL2
> system register formats compatible with E2H=1.

are compatible when HCR_EL2.E2H==1.

> 
> Now that we allow the virtual EL2 modify its EL2 registers without trap

to modify

without trapping, via...

> via the physical EL1 system register accesses, we need to reflect the
> changes made to the EL1 system registers to the virtual EL2 register
> states. This is not required to the virtual EL2 without VHE, since the

for virtual EL2 without...

> virtual EL2 should always use _EL2 accessors, which traps to EL2.

s/should always use/always uses/

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/context.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> index 39bd92d..9947bc8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,27 @@ struct el1_el2_map {
>  	{ VBAR_EL1, VBAR_EL2 },
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * List of pair of EL1/EL2 registers which are used to access real EL2
> + * registers in EL2 with E2H bit set.

in EL1?

Maybe you can just say:
   /*
    * List of system registers that can be directly mapped between VHE
    * EL2 system registers and EL1 system registers.
    */

> + */
> +static const struct el1_el2_map vhe_map[] = {
> +	{ SCTLR_EL1, SCTLR_EL2 },
> +	{ CPACR_EL1, CPTR_EL2 },
> +	{ TTBR0_EL1, TTBR0_EL2 },
> +	{ TTBR1_EL1, TTBR1_EL2 },
> +	{ TCR_EL1, TCR_EL2},
> +	{ AFSR0_EL1, AFSR0_EL2 },
> +	{ AFSR1_EL1, AFSR1_EL2 },
> +	{ ESR_EL1, ESR_EL2},
> +	{ FAR_EL1, FAR_EL2},
> +	{ MAIR_EL1, MAIR_EL2 },
> +	{ AMAIR_EL1, AMAIR_EL2 },
> +	{ VBAR_EL1, VBAR_EL2 },
> +	{ CONTEXTIDR_EL1, CONTEXTIDR_EL2 },
> +	{ CNTKCTL_EL1, CNTHCTL_EL2 },
> +};
> +
>  static inline u64 tcr_el2_ips_to_tcr_el1_ps(u64 tcr_el2)
>  {
>  	return ((tcr_el2 & TCR_EL2_PS_MASK) >> TCR_EL2_PS_SHIFT)
> @@ -57,7 +78,27 @@ static inline u64 cptr_to_cpacr(u64 cptr_el2)
>  	return cpacr_el1;
>  }
>  
> -static void flush_shadow_el1_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static void sync_shadow_el1_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	u64 *s_sys_regs = vcpu->arch.ctxt.shadow_sys_regs;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * In the virtual EL2 without VHE no EL1 system registers can't be

no other EL1 system register then el1_non_trap_regs[] can be changed
without trapping to the host hypervisor

> +	 * changed without trap except el1_non_trap_regs[]. So we have nothing
> +	 * to sync on exit from a guest.
> +	 */
> +	if (!vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu))
> +		return;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vhe_map); i++) {
> +		const struct el1_el2_map *map = &vhe_map[i];
> +
> +		vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, map->el2) = s_sys_regs[map->el1];
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void flush_shadow_el1_sysregs_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	u64 *s_sys_regs = vcpu->arch.ctxt.shadow_sys_regs;
>  	u64 tcr_el2;
> @@ -86,6 +127,29 @@ static void flush_shadow_el1_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	s_sys_regs[CPACR_EL1] = cptr_to_cpacr(vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, CPTR_EL2));
>  }
>  
> +static void flush_shadow_el1_sysregs_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	u64 *s_sys_regs = vcpu->arch.ctxt.shadow_sys_regs;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * When e2h bit is set, EL2 registers becomes compatible
> +	 * with corrensponding EL1 registers. So, no conversion required.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vhe_map); i++) {
> +		const struct el1_el2_map *map = &vhe_map[i];
> +
> +		s_sys_regs[map->el1] = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, map->el2);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void flush_shadow_el1_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	if (vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu))
> +		flush_shadow_el1_sysregs_vhe(vcpu);
> +	else
> +		flush_shadow_el1_sysregs_nvhe(vcpu);
> +}
>  
>  /*
>   * List of EL0 and EL1 registers which we allow the virtual EL2 mode to access
> @@ -247,6 +311,7 @@ void kvm_arm_restore_shadow_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	if (unlikely(is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu))) {
>  		sync_shadow_special_regs(vcpu);
>  		sync_shadow_non_trap_el1_state(vcpu);
> +		sync_shadow_el1_sysregs(vcpu);
>  	} else
>  		sync_special_regs(vcpu);
>  }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Thanks,
-Christoffer

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-31  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18 16:58 [RFC PATCH v2 00/38] Nested Virtualization on KVM/ARM Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/38] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT feature Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Enable nested virtualization via command-line Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 19:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 13:56     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/38] KVM: arm64: Add KVM nesting feature Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Check if nested virtualization is in use Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 19:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 13:59     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 19:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 14:07     ` Jintack Lim
2017-08-01 14:58       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/38] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to set PSR_MODE_EL2x Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/38] KVM: arm64: Add vcpu_mode_el2 primitive to support nesting Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 system registers to vcpu context Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 special " Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 19:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 14:08     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/38] KVM: arm64: Add the shadow context for virtual EL2 execution Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Add a framework to prepare " Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 12:02   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/38] KVM: arm64: Set vcpu context depending on the guest exception level Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/38] arm64: Add missing TCR hw defines Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/38] KVM: arm64: Create shadow EL1 registers Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/38] KVM: arm64: Synchronize EL1 system registers on virtual EL2 entry and exit Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/38] KVM: arm64: Move exception macros and enums to a common file Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/38] KVM: arm64: Support to inject exceptions to the virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/38] KVM: arm64: Trap EL1 VM register accesses in " Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/38] KVM: arm64: Trap SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 from " Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/38] KVM: arm64: Trap CPACR_EL1 access in " Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/38] KVM: arm64: Handle eret instruction traps Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 14:11     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/38] KVM: arm64: Set a handler for the system " Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/38] KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/38] KVM: arm64: Inject HVC exceptions to the virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/38] KVM: arm64: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TWX setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/38] KVM: arm64: Respect virtual CPTR_EL2.TFP setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/38] KVM: arm64: Add macros to support the virtual EL2 with VHE Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 registers defined in ARMv8.1 to vcpu context Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/38] KVM: arm64: Emulate EL12 register accesses from the virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-07-31  8:44   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/38] KVM: arm64: Support a VM with VHE considering EL0 of the VHE host Jintack Lim
2017-07-31  9:01   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/38] KVM: arm64: Allow the virtual EL2 to access EL2 states without trap Jintack Lim
2017-07-31  9:37   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/38] KVM: arm64: Manage the shadow states when virtual E2H bit enabled Jintack Lim
2017-07-31  9:57   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/38] KVM: arm64: Trap and emulate CPTR_EL2 accesses via CPACR_EL1 from the virtual EL2 with VHE Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:04   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/38] KVM: arm64: Emulate appropriate VM control system registers Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:09   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV bit setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 35/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV bit setting for EL12 register traps Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:39   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 36/38] KVM: arm64: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TVM and TRVM settings Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:42   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 37/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV1 bit setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-19  2:24   ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:53   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 38/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual CPTR_EL2.TCPAC setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 11:03     ` Jintack Lim
2017-08-01 11:20       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-19  2:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/38] Nested Virtualization on KVM/ARM Jintack Lim
2017-07-19  8:49   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-19 14:35     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-28 20:13   ` Bandan Das
2017-07-28 21:45     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 13:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 10:48   ` Jintack Lim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170731095721.GR5176@cbox \
    --to=cdall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).