From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] acpi/iort: numa: Add numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:52:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170803135213.GA11451@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <598326B1.7040508@huawei.com>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:35:45PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2017/8/3 0:21, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Patch that I will send upstream below, please check, thanks.
> >
> > -- >8 --
> > Subject: [PATCH] ACPI/IORT: numa: Add numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices
> >
> > ARM IORT specification(rev. C) has added provision to define proximity
> > domain in SMMUv3 IORT table. Adding required code to parse Proximity
> > domain and set numa_node of smmv3 platform devices.
> >
> > Add code to parse proximity domain in SMMUv3 IORT table to
> > set numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices.
> >
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170706112017.GA16981 at rric.localdomain
> > Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>
> > [lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com: updated review comments]
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> > index a3215ee..35dd803 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> > @@ -908,6 +908,27 @@ static bool __init arm_smmu_v3_is_coherent(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> > return smmu->flags & ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_COHACC_OVERRIDE;
> > }
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA) && defined(ACPI_IORT_SMMU_v3_PXM_VALID)
>
> Typo here, s/v3/V3, wit this typo, smmu proximity callback will be set to NULL.
>
> > +/*
> > + * set numa proximity domain for smmuv3 device
> > + */
> > +static void __init arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity(struct device *dev,
> > + struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *smmu;
> > +
> > + smmu = (struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *)node->node_data;
> > + if (smmu->flags & ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_PXM_VALID) {
> > + set_dev_node(dev, acpi_map_pxm_to_node(smmu->pxm));
> > + dev_info(dev, "SMMUV3[%llx] Mapped to Proximity domain %d\n",
> > + smmu->base_address,
> > + smmu->pxm);
>
> Here I got:
>
> [ 5.074246] (null): SMMUV3[a0040000] Mapped to Proximity domain 0
> [ 5.074296] (null): SMMUV3[700a0040000] Mapped to Proximity domain 2
> [ 5.074319] (null): SMMUV3[c0040000] Mapped to Proximity domain 0
> [ 5.074344] (null): SMMUV3[8a0040000] Mapped to Proximity domain 1
> [ 5.074368] (null): SMMUV3[600a0040000] Mapped to Proximity domain 2
>
> SMMU is probed via static table (IORT) , so no proper name before it
> fully probed.
>
> Can we just use pr_info here to remove the meaningless (null), or
> we give the SMMU a proper name?
Yes on both counts, Ganapatrao sent me offline a fixed-up patch that I
will send upstream with the two changes you requested.
Thanks for checking anyway.
Lorenzo
>
> Thanks
> Hanjun
>
> > + }
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +#define arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity NULL
> > +#endif
> > +
> > static int __init arm_smmu_count_resources(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> > {
> > struct acpi_iort_smmu *smmu;
> > @@ -977,13 +998,16 @@ struct iort_iommu_config {
> > int (*iommu_count_resources)(struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> > void (*iommu_init_resources)(struct resource *res,
> > struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> > + void (*iommu_set_proximity)(struct device *dev,
> > + struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> > };
> >
> > static const struct iort_iommu_config iort_arm_smmu_v3_cfg __initconst = {
> > .name = "arm-smmu-v3",
> > .iommu_is_coherent = arm_smmu_v3_is_coherent,
> > .iommu_count_resources = arm_smmu_v3_count_resources,
> > - .iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_v3_init_resources
> > + .iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_v3_init_resources,
> > + .iommu_set_proximity = arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct iort_iommu_config iort_arm_smmu_cfg __initconst = {
> > @@ -1028,6 +1052,9 @@ static int __init iort_add_smmu_platform_device(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> > if (!pdev)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + if (ops->iommu_set_proximity)
> > + ops->iommu_set_proximity(&pdev->dev, node);
> > +
> > count = ops->iommu_count_resources(node);
> >
> > r = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*r), GFP_KERNEL);
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-03 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-25 5:02 [PATCH v4] acpi/iort: numa: Add numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-07-25 15:13 ` Robert Richter
2017-07-25 16:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-02 16:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-03 13:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-08-03 13:40 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-08-03 13:52 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-08-15 15:02 ` Robert Richter
2017-08-15 15:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-15 16:10 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170803135213.GA11451@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).