From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:24:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: r8a7743: Add IIC cores to dtsi In-Reply-To: <20170810080121.GE16647@verge.net.au> References: <1502196418-31341-1-git-send-email-biju.das@bp.renesas.com> <12d923ba-184c-ef59-f27b-41a7592a5f93@cogentembedded.com> <20170810080121.GE16647@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <20170810112411.GA4380@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > >+ i2c6: i2c at e60b0000 { > > > > I'd use iic0 as the label. > > I have no preference here other than that we try to be consistent > in DT for different R-Car SoCs. Wolfram, do you have an opinion on this? Back then, for M2-W, I decided to go with the schematics/datasheets. And those mentioned i2c6 rather than iic0. For that reason, the comment "/* The memory map in the User's Manual maps the cores to bus numbers */" exists in r8a7791.dtsi. Dunno the manual of this SoC here. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: