From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:08:12 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: drop broken RPM status update from suspend_noirq In-Reply-To: <20170726083521.GE27516@localhost> References: <20170724095201.21601-1-johan@kernel.org> <05ae4585-8da0-6fb1-8cfd-6b236ec3a8a2@ti.com> <20170725082444.GL2729@localhost> <3f0f8ed2-9466-d5c9-10e4-de95e5155653@ti.com> <20170726075004.GD27516@localhost> <20170726081716.GB10026@atomide.com> <20170726083521.GE27516@localhost> Message-ID: <20170810150812.GB8569@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Johan Hovold [170726 01:36]: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:17:17AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Johan Hovold [170726 00:51]: > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:48:40PM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > > > > So, thank you for your patches and sorry for the noise. > > > > > > > > Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko > > > > > > Thanks for testing. > > > > So does the patch description need updating? > > I don't think so. > > I did notice that I left out a "would" in the final sentence > > "and either way, any such calls *would* have been causing > crashes since 4.10" > > which perhaps you could add when applying? > > > And this is needed as a fix for the -rc cycle in addition to your musb > > patch? > > Unlike the musb patch, this one is not critical and could possibly wait > for 4.14. But since all it does is to get rid of a (since 4.10) broken > state update, and thereby those warning messages on suspend, I'd say > it's -rc material. Applying into omap-for-v4.13/fixes finally thanks. Tony