From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:22:20 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: twl: move header file out of I2C realm In-Reply-To: <20170814084340.65morabelapfegph@ninjato> References: <20170521220212.1404-1-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20170521220212.1404-4-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20170706064453.GH16144@ulmo.fritz.box> <20170706070352.xdecvsnremwqed72@dell> <20170813133700.tv4ka7anvbzcplr7@ninjato> <20170814064247.qvggx4ito4vgjqvs@dell> <20170814084340.65morabelapfegph@ninjato> Message-ID: <20170814162219.GX8569@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Wolfram Sang [170814 01:43]: > > > > Given the triviality of the change for non-MFD subsystems, can we apply > > > this for 4.14? > > > > I can't apply anything without Acks for *all* of the subsystems above. > > Well, there are cases when you can. Those should be exceptions and well > justified, of course. > > > My suggestion would be to collect the Acks you've received up until > > this point and identify which SS's are still lacking in change log > > section of a RESEND. > > I agree, though, that I can try a second round to get the acks. As long as it's been compile tested with omap2plus_defconfig: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren