From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:31:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] net: stmmac: register parent MDIO node for sun8i-h3-emac In-Reply-To: <20170821132015.GB1703@lunn.ch> References: <20170818122118.4925-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20170818122118.4925-4-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20170819185025.GB13266@Red> <20170819203836.GA21567@lunn.ch> <20170820065757.GA6081@Red> <20170820142545.GB24150@lunn.ch> <20170821132015.GB1703@lunn.ch> Message-ID: <20170821133104.qvrhvwin2rdg4aqo@flea.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Andrew, On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:20:15PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > With our hardware, and likely Rockchip's as well, the muxed connections > > include the MDIO and MII connections > > Ah, i did not realise the MII was muxed as well. Then i agree, an MDIO > mux is wrong. > > However, please try to make the binding not look like an mdio mux. We > don't want people misunderstanding the binding and thinking it is an > mdio mux. Do you have any suggestion on what the binding would look like? All muxes are mostly always represented the same way afaik, or do you want to simply introduce a new compatible / property? Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: