From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kim.phillips@arm.com (Kim Phillips) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 18:31:39 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 00/17] coresight: next v4.12-rc4 In-Reply-To: <20170615155054.GN28496@leoy-ThinkPad-T440> References: <1496693718-9191-1-git-send-email-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> <20170609175339.28d1d4d5a6c91a9e16c16bf7@arm.com> <20170613161712.f1f3cac734939d8728c7ed77@arm.com> <20170614062229.GA28496@leoy-ThinkPad-T440> <20170614223453.3357117a7f25ee68924a071c@arm.com> <20170615092246.bc4fb71637e482a118199864@arm.com> <20170615155054.GN28496@leoy-ThinkPad-T440> Message-ID: <20170821183139.76faaa5fb55962815616395b@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:50:54 +0800 Leo Yan wrote: > Looked into the code, and I must apologize I have not verified the > command when wrote the doc. As you pointed out, the closing file > operation releases the constraint for PM QoS. > > Below command can work (I tested): > exec 3<> /dev/cpu_dma_latency; echo 0 >&3 > > Will commit one patch for this. Did I miss this? Where was it posted? Thanks, Kim