From: rkrcmar@redhat.com (Radim Krčmář)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 1/9] KVM: s390: optimize detection of started vcpus
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:35:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170821203530.9266-2-rkrcmar@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170821203530.9266-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
We can add a variable instead of scanning all online VCPUs to know how
many are started. We can't trivially tell which VCPU is the last one,
though.
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Radim Kr?m?? <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 39 +++++++++++++++------------------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index a409d5991934..be0d0bdf585b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -735,6 +735,7 @@ struct kvm_arch{
struct mutex ipte_mutex;
struct ratelimit_state sthyi_limit;
spinlock_t start_stop_lock;
+ unsigned started_vcpus;
struct sie_page2 *sie_page2;
struct kvm_s390_cpu_model model;
struct kvm_s390_crypto crypto;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 9f23a9e81a91..1534778a3c66 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -3414,25 +3414,17 @@ static void __enable_ibs_on_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int i, online_vcpus, started_vcpus = 0;
-
if (!is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu))
return;
trace_kvm_s390_vcpu_start_stop(vcpu->vcpu_id, 1);
/* Only one cpu at a time may enter/leave the STOPPED state. */
spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
- online_vcpus = atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->online_vcpus);
- for (i = 0; i < online_vcpus; i++) {
- if (!is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu->kvm->vcpus[i]))
- started_vcpus++;
- }
-
- if (started_vcpus == 0) {
+ if (vcpu->kvm->arch.started_vcpus == 0) {
/* we're the only active VCPU -> speed it up */
__enable_ibs_on_vcpu(vcpu);
- } else if (started_vcpus == 1) {
+ } else if (vcpu->kvm->arch.started_vcpus == 1) {
/*
* As we are starting a second VCPU, we have to disable
* the IBS facility on all VCPUs to remove potentially
@@ -3441,6 +3433,8 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
__disable_ibs_on_all_vcpus(vcpu->kvm);
}
+ vcpu->kvm->arch.started_vcpus++;
+
atomic_andnot(CPUSTAT_STOPPED, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->cpuflags);
/*
* Another VCPU might have used IBS while we were offline.
@@ -3453,16 +3447,12 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int i, online_vcpus, started_vcpus = 0;
- struct kvm_vcpu *started_vcpu = NULL;
-
if (is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu))
return;
trace_kvm_s390_vcpu_start_stop(vcpu->vcpu_id, 0);
/* Only one cpu at a time may enter/leave the STOPPED state. */
spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
- online_vcpus = atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->online_vcpus);
/* SIGP STOP and SIGP STOP AND STORE STATUS has been fully processed */
kvm_s390_clear_stop_irq(vcpu);
@@ -3470,19 +3460,20 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
atomic_or(CPUSTAT_STOPPED, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->cpuflags);
__disable_ibs_on_vcpu(vcpu);
- for (i = 0; i < online_vcpus; i++) {
- if (!is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu->kvm->vcpus[i])) {
- started_vcpus++;
- started_vcpu = vcpu->kvm->vcpus[i];
- }
- }
+ vcpu->kvm->arch.started_vcpus--;
+
+ if (vcpu->kvm->arch.started_vcpus == 1) {
+ struct kvm_vcpu *started_vcpu;
- if (started_vcpus == 1) {
/*
- * As we only have one VCPU left, we want to enable the
- * IBS facility for that VCPU to speed it up.
+ * As we only have one VCPU left, we want to enable the IBS
+ * facility for that VCPU to speed it up.
*/
- __enable_ibs_on_vcpu(started_vcpu);
+ kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, started_vcpu, vcpu->kvm)
+ if (!is_vcpu_stopped(started_vcpu)) {
+ __enable_ibs_on_vcpu(started_vcpu);
+ break;
+ }
}
spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
--
2.13.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-21 20:35 [PATCH RFC v3 0/9] KVM: allow dynamic kvm->vcpus array Radim Krčmář
2017-08-21 20:35 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-08-22 7:26 ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/9] KVM: s390: optimize detection of started vcpus Christian Borntraeger
2017-08-22 11:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 11:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-29 12:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 12:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-29 11:26 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/9] KVM: arm/arm64: fix vcpu self-detection in vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi() Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 11:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 10:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/9] KVM: remember position in kvm->vcpus array Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 11:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 11:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/9] KVM: arm/arm64: use locking helpers in kvm_vgic_create() Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 11:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 10:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 5/9] KVM: remove unused __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC Radim Krčmář
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 6/9] KVM: rework kvm_vcpu_on_spin loop Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 14:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 15:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 7/9] KVM: add kvm_free_vcpus and kvm_arch_free_vcpus Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 13:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 8/9] KVM: implement kvm_for_each_vcpu with a list Radim Krčmář
2017-08-29 9:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 9/9] KVM: split kvm->vcpus into chunks Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170821203530.9266-2-rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).