linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rkrcmar@redhat.com (Radim Krčmář)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 1/9] KVM: s390: optimize detection of started vcpus
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:35:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170821203530.9266-2-rkrcmar@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170821203530.9266-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com>

We can add a variable instead of scanning all online VCPUs to know how
many are started.  We can't trivially tell which VCPU is the last one,
though.

Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Radim Kr?m?? <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 +
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         | 39 +++++++++++++++------------------------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index a409d5991934..be0d0bdf585b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -735,6 +735,7 @@ struct kvm_arch{
 	struct mutex ipte_mutex;
 	struct ratelimit_state sthyi_limit;
 	spinlock_t start_stop_lock;
+	unsigned started_vcpus;
 	struct sie_page2 *sie_page2;
 	struct kvm_s390_cpu_model model;
 	struct kvm_s390_crypto crypto;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 9f23a9e81a91..1534778a3c66 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -3414,25 +3414,17 @@ static void __enable_ibs_on_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	int i, online_vcpus, started_vcpus = 0;
-
 	if (!is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu))
 		return;
 
 	trace_kvm_s390_vcpu_start_stop(vcpu->vcpu_id, 1);
 	/* Only one cpu at a time may enter/leave the STOPPED state. */
 	spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
-	online_vcpus = atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->online_vcpus);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < online_vcpus; i++) {
-		if (!is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu->kvm->vcpus[i]))
-			started_vcpus++;
-	}
-
-	if (started_vcpus == 0) {
+	if (vcpu->kvm->arch.started_vcpus == 0) {
 		/* we're the only active VCPU -> speed it up */
 		__enable_ibs_on_vcpu(vcpu);
-	} else if (started_vcpus == 1) {
+	} else if (vcpu->kvm->arch.started_vcpus == 1) {
 		/*
 		 * As we are starting a second VCPU, we have to disable
 		 * the IBS facility on all VCPUs to remove potentially
@@ -3441,6 +3433,8 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		__disable_ibs_on_all_vcpus(vcpu->kvm);
 	}
 
+	vcpu->kvm->arch.started_vcpus++;
+
 	atomic_andnot(CPUSTAT_STOPPED, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->cpuflags);
 	/*
 	 * Another VCPU might have used IBS while we were offline.
@@ -3453,16 +3447,12 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	int i, online_vcpus, started_vcpus = 0;
-	struct kvm_vcpu *started_vcpu = NULL;
-
 	if (is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu))
 		return;
 
 	trace_kvm_s390_vcpu_start_stop(vcpu->vcpu_id, 0);
 	/* Only one cpu at a time may enter/leave the STOPPED state. */
 	spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
-	online_vcpus = atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->online_vcpus);
 
 	/* SIGP STOP and SIGP STOP AND STORE STATUS has been fully processed */
 	kvm_s390_clear_stop_irq(vcpu);
@@ -3470,19 +3460,20 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	atomic_or(CPUSTAT_STOPPED, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->cpuflags);
 	__disable_ibs_on_vcpu(vcpu);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < online_vcpus; i++) {
-		if (!is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu->kvm->vcpus[i])) {
-			started_vcpus++;
-			started_vcpu = vcpu->kvm->vcpus[i];
-		}
-	}
+	vcpu->kvm->arch.started_vcpus--;
+
+	if (vcpu->kvm->arch.started_vcpus == 1) {
+		struct kvm_vcpu *started_vcpu;
 
-	if (started_vcpus == 1) {
 		/*
-		 * As we only have one VCPU left, we want to enable the
-		 * IBS facility for that VCPU to speed it up.
+		 * As we only have one VCPU left, we want to enable the IBS
+		 * facility for that VCPU to speed it up.
 		 */
-		__enable_ibs_on_vcpu(started_vcpu);
+		kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, started_vcpu, vcpu->kvm)
+			if (!is_vcpu_stopped(started_vcpu)) {
+				__enable_ibs_on_vcpu(started_vcpu);
+				break;
+			}
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
-- 
2.13.3

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-21 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-21 20:35 [PATCH RFC v3 0/9] KVM: allow dynamic kvm->vcpus array Radim Krčmář
2017-08-21 20:35 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-08-22  7:26   ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/9] KVM: s390: optimize detection of started vcpus Christian Borntraeger
2017-08-22 11:31   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 11:23     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-29 12:05       ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 12:42         ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-29 11:26   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/9] KVM: arm/arm64: fix vcpu self-detection in vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi() Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 11:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 10:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/9] KVM: remember position in kvm->vcpus array Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 11:44   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 11:30   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/9] KVM: arm/arm64: use locking helpers in kvm_vgic_create() Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 11:51   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 10:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 5/9] KVM: remove unused __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC Radim Krčmář
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 6/9] KVM: rework kvm_vcpu_on_spin loop Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 14:06   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 15:24     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 7/9] KVM: add kvm_free_vcpus and kvm_arch_free_vcpus Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 14:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 13:00     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 8/9] KVM: implement kvm_for_each_vcpu with a list Radim Krčmář
2017-08-29  9:58   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 9/9] KVM: split kvm->vcpus into chunks Radim Krčmář

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170821203530.9266-2-rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).