linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rkrcmar@redhat.com (Radim Krčmář)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 6/9] KVM: rework kvm_vcpu_on_spin loop
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:35:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170821203530.9266-7-rkrcmar@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170821203530.9266-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com>

The original code managed to obfuscate a straightforward idea:
start iterating from the selected index and reset the index to 0 when
reaching the end of online vcpus, then iterate until reaching the index
that we started at.

The resulting code is a bit better, IMO.  (Still horrible, though.)

Signed-off-by: Radim Kr?m?? <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/kvm_host.h | 13 +++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 47 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index abd5cb1feb9e..cfb3c0efdd51 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -498,6 +498,19 @@ static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int i)
 	     (vcpup = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, idx)) != NULL; \
 	     idx++)
 
+#define kvm_for_each_vcpu_from(idx, vcpup, from, kvm) \
+	for (idx = from, vcpup = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, idx); \
+	     vcpup; \
+	     ({ \
+		idx++; \
+		if (idx >= atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)) \
+			idx = 0; \
+		if (idx == from) \
+			vcpup = NULL; \
+		else \
+			vcpup = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, idx); \
+	      }))
+
 static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(struct kvm *kvm, int id)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index d89261d0d8c6..33a15e176927 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2333,8 +2333,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me, bool yield_to_kernel_mode)
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	int last_boosted_vcpu = me->kvm->last_boosted_vcpu;
 	int yielded = 0;
-	int try = 3;
-	int pass;
+	int try = 2;
 	int i;
 
 	kvm_vcpu_set_in_spin_loop(me, true);
@@ -2345,34 +2344,24 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me, bool yield_to_kernel_mode)
 	 * VCPU is holding the lock that we need and will release it.
 	 * We approximate round-robin by starting at the last boosted VCPU.
 	 */
-	for (pass = 0; pass < 2 && !yielded && try; pass++) {
-		kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
-			if (!pass && i <= last_boosted_vcpu) {
-				i = last_boosted_vcpu;
-				continue;
-			} else if (pass && i > last_boosted_vcpu)
-				break;
-			if (!ACCESS_ONCE(vcpu->preempted))
-				continue;
-			if (vcpu == me)
-				continue;
-			if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq) && !kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu))
-				continue;
-			if (yield_to_kernel_mode && !kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu))
-				continue;
-			if (!kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_directed_yield(vcpu))
-				continue;
+	kvm_for_each_vcpu_from(i, vcpu, last_boosted_vcpu, kvm) {
+		if (!ACCESS_ONCE(vcpu->preempted))
+			continue;
+		if (vcpu == me)
+			continue;
+		if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq) && !kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu))
+			continue;
+		if (yield_to_kernel_mode && !kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu))
+			continue;
+		if (!kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_directed_yield(vcpu))
+			continue;
 
-			yielded = kvm_vcpu_yield_to(vcpu);
-			if (yielded > 0) {
-				kvm->last_boosted_vcpu = i;
-				break;
-			} else if (yielded < 0) {
-				try--;
-				if (!try)
-					break;
-			}
-		}
+		yielded = kvm_vcpu_yield_to(vcpu);
+		if (yielded > 0) {
+			kvm->last_boosted_vcpu = i;
+			break;
+		} else if (yielded < 0 && !try--)
+			break;
 	}
 	kvm_vcpu_set_in_spin_loop(me, false);
 
-- 
2.13.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-21 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-21 20:35 [PATCH RFC v3 0/9] KVM: allow dynamic kvm->vcpus array Radim Krčmář
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/9] KVM: s390: optimize detection of started vcpus Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22  7:26   ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-08-22 11:31   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 11:23     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-29 12:05       ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 12:42         ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-29 11:26   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/9] KVM: arm/arm64: fix vcpu self-detection in vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi() Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 11:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 10:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/9] KVM: remember position in kvm->vcpus array Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 11:44   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 11:30   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/9] KVM: arm/arm64: use locking helpers in kvm_vgic_create() Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 11:51   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 10:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 5/9] KVM: remove unused __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC Radim Krčmář
2017-08-21 20:35 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-08-22 14:06   ` [PATCH RFC v3 6/9] KVM: rework kvm_vcpu_on_spin loop David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 15:24     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 7/9] KVM: add kvm_free_vcpus and kvm_arch_free_vcpus Radim Krčmář
2017-08-22 14:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-29 13:00     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 8/9] KVM: implement kvm_for_each_vcpu with a list Radim Krčmář
2017-08-29  9:58   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-21 20:35 ` [PATCH RFC v3 9/9] KVM: split kvm->vcpus into chunks Radim Krčmář

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170821203530.9266-7-rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).