From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:54:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] of: Restrict DMA configuration
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+pDHbrpLDYUVu22tk4OtR9Di4vxZUozwWJDu2ebYSBdg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0819179085df6c41c70e83a2c5c138b95c0386b3.1502468875.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
 <82633e62b64e28dc18bc466319065b92faf2414f.1502468875.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
 <CAL_JsqKW7nhkCDu4eEDCgdC87b0MLH1UFO8LvaH22BcJMBsY7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <6819c6ae-e898-3293-d8b0-7a80108d7628@arm.com>
 <CAL_Jsq+pDHbrpLDYUVu22tk4OtR9Di4vxZUozwWJDu2ebYSBdg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170825145457.GA17842@lst.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:19:50AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > For the immediate issue at hand, I guess the alternative plan of attack
> > would be to stick a flag in struct bus_type for the bus drivers
> > themselves to opt into generic DMA configuration. That at least keeps
> > everything within the kernel (and come to think of it probably works
> > neatly for modular bus types as well).
> 
> I'm fine with the change as is, it's really just the commit text I'm
> commenting on.

Robin, can you resend this with an updated commit text?