[PATCH v5] arm64: allwinner: h5: add support for NanoPi NEO Plus2

[maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)]

Hi Antony,

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:53:13PM +0200, Antony Antony wrote:
> > > +&emac {
> > > +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > +	pinctrl-0 = <&emac_rgmii_pins>;
> > > +	phy-supply = <&reg_gmac_3v3>;
> > > +	phy-handle = <&ext_rgmii_phy>;
> > > +	phy-mode = "rgmii";
> > > +	status = "okay";
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +&mdio {
> > > +	ext_rgmii_phy: ethernet-phy at 7 {
> > > +		compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
> > > +		reg = <7>;
> > > +	};
> > > +};
> > 
> > This will not compile.
> 
> I don't understand you, because, v5 file compiled for me. Here is output 
> from running system, just the relevant part.  using dtc -I fs 
> /proc/device-tree
> 
> ext_rgmii_phy = "/soc/ethernet at 1c30000/mdio/ethernet-phy at 7";
> 
> ethernet at 1c30000 {
> 	mdio {
> 	..
> 		ethernet-phy at 7 {
> 			compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
> 			phandle = <0x1c>;
> 			reg = <0x7>;
> 			linux,phandle = <0x1c>;
> 		};
> };
> 
> Is this what you expect?

The bindings have been reverted recently, so if you based your work on
a version between 4.13-rc1 and 4.13-rc6 it will work, but anything
more recent will not compile anymore.

> > > +	status = "okay";
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * AMPAK AP6212A WiFi module with BCM43430, rev=1 inside
> > > +	 * sdio vendor ID: 0x02d0, sdio device ID: 0xa9a6
> > > +	 * There is no specific Documentation: dt-binding for BCM43430
> > > +	 * brcm,bcm4329-fmac compatible can initialize this module
> > > +	 */
> > 
> > This is not really relevant.
> 
> would you prefer no comment or a rewrite? How does this look?
> 
> /*
>  * AMPAK AP6212A WiFi module with BCM43430, rev=1 inside
>  * sdio vendor ID: 0x02d0, sdio device ID: 0xa9a6
>  */
> 
> I am afraid a casual reader would think "brcm,bcm4329-fmac" is wrong, 
> because that is not the actual chip inside the module.

No comment is fine, and I'm not sure the casual reader will ever read
this :)

> > > +&mmc2_8bit_pins {
> > > +	/* Increase drive strength for DDR modes */
> > > +	drive-strength = <40>;
> > 
> > It's very likely that you actually don't need 40mA
> 
> drive-strength and the node mmc2_8bit_pins are gone. When I removed it 
> drive-strength = <0x1e>;  seems the default. And eMMC seems to work when 
> booting from Micro SD.

Yes, we set the specs default in the DTSI. 40mA is above what the spec
requires, so not a big deal, but useless.

> NOTE: the  40mA came from a vresion of vendor's old dts file and I also 
> noticed the same value is used in other dts in kernel e.g 
> sun8i-h3-orangepi-plus.dts, sun9i-a80-cubieboard4.dts
> It could be a copy paste error or those boards need it. Anyway I removed it.

And we used to let that in before yes, so there might be some places
where it's left.

Feel free to clean them up if you feel bored :)

> > > +&usb_otg {
> > > +	dr_mode = "host";
> > > +	status = "okay";
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +&usbphy {
> > > +	/* USB Type-A ports' VBUS is always on */
> > > +	usb0_id_det-gpios = <&pio 6 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PG12 */
> > 
> > If it has an ID-detect pin, then it's not a host-only USB OTG
> > controller. dr_mode should be set to otga 
> 
> good point. I don't see an ID-detect connected in the schematic. The 
> previous generation had. 
> 
> I will leave 
> &usb_otg {
>   dr_mode = "host";
>   status = "okay";
> };
> 
> &usbphy {
> 	/* USB Type-A ports' VBUS is always on */
> 	status = "okay";
> };

Looking at the schematics, it seems that the micro USB isn't even
wired to a bus but is only used to power the board. If so, you can
even remove the usb_otg node.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170904/bba20100/attachment.sig>