linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PULL 2/8] KVM: arm/arm64: PMU: Fix overflow interrupt injection
Date: Tue,  5 Sep 2017 16:52:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170905145207.18447-3-cdall@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170905145207.18447-1-cdall@linaro.org>

From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>

kvm_pmu_overflow_set() is called from perf's interrupt handler,
making the call of kvm_vgic_inject_irq() from it introduced with
"KVM: arm/arm64: PMU: remove request-less vcpu kick" a really bad
idea, as it's quite easy to try and retake a lock that the
interrupted context is already holding. The fix is to use a vcpu
kick, leaving the interrupt injection to kvm_pmu_sync_hwstate(),
like it was doing before the refactoring. We don't just revert,
though, because before the kick was request-less, leaving the vcpu
exposed to the request-less vcpu kick race, and also because the
kick was used unnecessarily from register access handlers.

Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c |  2 +-
 include/kvm/arm_pmu.h     |  2 --
 virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c        | 43 +++++++++++++++----------------------------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 7786288..2e070d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static bool access_pmovs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
 	if (p->is_write) {
 		if (r->CRm & 0x2)
 			/* accessing PMOVSSET_EL0 */
-			kvm_pmu_overflow_set(vcpu, p->regval & mask);
+			vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) |= (p->regval & mask);
 		else
 			/* accessing PMOVSCLR_EL0 */
 			vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) &= ~(p->regval & mask);
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
index f6e0306..f87fe20 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
 void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
-void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
 void kvm_pmu_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_pmu_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvm_pmu_should_notify_user(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
@@ -86,7 +85,6 @@ static inline void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
 static inline void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
-static inline void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
 static inline void kvm_pmu_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_pmu_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline bool kvm_pmu_should_notify_user(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
index fc8a723..8a9c423 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
@@ -203,11 +203,15 @@ static u64 kvm_pmu_overflow_status(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return reg;
 }
 
-static void kvm_pmu_check_overflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void kvm_pmu_update_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
-	bool overflow = !!kvm_pmu_overflow_status(vcpu);
+	bool overflow;
+
+	if (!kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu))
+		return;
 
+	overflow = !!kvm_pmu_overflow_status(vcpu);
 	if (pmu->irq_level == overflow)
 		return;
 
@@ -215,33 +219,11 @@ static void kvm_pmu_check_overflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))) {
 		int ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
-					      pmu->irq_num, overflow,
-					      &vcpu->arch.pmu);
+					      pmu->irq_num, overflow, pmu);
 		WARN_ON(ret);
 	}
 }
 
-/**
- * kvm_pmu_overflow_set - set PMU overflow interrupt
- * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
- * @val: the value guest writes to PMOVSSET register
- */
-void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
-{
-	if (val == 0)
-		return;
-
-	vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) |= val;
-	kvm_pmu_check_overflow(vcpu);
-}
-
-static void kvm_pmu_update_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	if (!kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu))
-		return;
-	kvm_pmu_check_overflow(vcpu);
-}
-
 bool kvm_pmu_should_notify_user(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
@@ -303,7 +285,7 @@ static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 }
 
 /**
- * When perf event overflows, call kvm_pmu_overflow_set to set overflow status.
+ * When the perf event overflows, set the overflow status and inform the vcpu.
  */
 static void kvm_pmu_perf_overflow(struct perf_event *perf_event,
 				  struct perf_sample_data *data,
@@ -313,7 +295,12 @@ static void kvm_pmu_perf_overflow(struct perf_event *perf_event,
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc);
 	int idx = pmc->idx;
 
-	kvm_pmu_overflow_set(vcpu, BIT(idx));
+	vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) |= BIT(idx);
+
+	if (kvm_pmu_overflow_status(vcpu)) {
+		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_IRQ_PENDING, vcpu);
+		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -341,7 +328,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
 			reg = lower_32_bits(reg);
 			vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + i) = reg;
 			if (!reg)
-				kvm_pmu_overflow_set(vcpu, BIT(i));
+				vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) |= BIT(i);
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
2.9.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-05 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-05 14:51 [PULL 0/8] KVM/ARM Changes for v4.14 Christoffer Dall
2017-09-05 14:52 ` [PULL 1/8] KVM: arm/arm64: Fix bug in advertising KVM_CAP_MSI_DEVID capability Christoffer Dall
2017-09-05 14:52 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-09-05 14:52 ` [PULL 3/8] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle hva aging while destroying the vm Christoffer Dall
2017-09-05 14:52 ` [PULL 4/8] KVM: arm/arm64: Fix guest external abort matching Christoffer Dall
2017-09-05 14:52 ` [PULL 5/8] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: constify seq_operations and file_operations Christoffer Dall
2017-09-05 14:52 ` [PULL 6/8] KVM: arm/arm64: vITS: Drop its_ite->lpi field Christoffer Dall
2017-09-05 14:52 ` [PULL 7/8] KVM: arm/arm64: Extract GICv3 max APRn index calculation Christoffer Dall
2017-09-05 14:52 ` [PULL 8/8] KVM: arm/arm64: Support uaccess of GICC_APRn Christoffer Dall
2017-09-05 15:07 ` [PULL 0/8] KVM/ARM Changes for v4.14 Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170905145207.18447-3-cdall@linaro.org \
    --to=cdall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).