From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:53:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/29] implement KASLR for ARM
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8ngWMvkmNr77SzL8fEvSc5K-OntoZQ53vgWVLHhAajaw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKv+Gu9c_j0qriRazSTmq8eD9icCu4Wuzw1z-LF7bubLVLQd7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170905212742.GG5024@atomide.com>
 <CAKv+Gu8uZH5PFVBwEGAK1hjGMTJD1a1KN0dVUjw=M3GPsps1FQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKv+Gu8qROYaQFSxChoz8cmS0S1wwqDmUvduXC_reQn1L7gFKg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170906162222.GI5024@atomide.com>
 <CAKv+Gu__-WeHKDGwg4rNM9Dw8V471wNQX=J3mfz_AUKHVUza_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170906163100.GJ5024@atomide.com>
 <CAKv+Gu-HGM6T6cV25bo6_bBcZaV-x3qpc9XoYUA4AEx68Joz=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170906171253.GK5024@atomide.com>
 <CAKv+Gu8ngWMvkmNr77SzL8fEvSc5K-OntoZQ53vgWVLHhAajaw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170906175308.GL5024@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> [170906 10:31]:
> On 6 September 2017 at 18:12, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > Kernel image @ 0x81000000 [ 0x000000 - 0x426300 ]
> > ## Flattened Device Tree blob at 84000000
> >    Booting using the fdt blob at 0x84000000
> >    Loading Device Tree to 86feb000, end 86fff2d5 ... OK
> >
> > Starting kernel ...
> >
> > regions.image_size:00e00000
> > regions.pa_start:80000000
> > regions.pa_end:87200000
> > regions.zimage_start:81000000
> > regions.zimage_size:00437320
> > regions.dtb_start:86feb000
> > regions.dtb_size:00012000
> > regions.initrd_start:00000000
> > regions.initrd_size:00000000
> > num:00000028
> > num:00000025
> > *kaslr_offset:05e00000
> > Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel.
> > Warning: Neither atags nor dtb found
> 
> OK, so in this case, 80000000 + 00e00000 + 05e00000 == 86c00000, which
> is still below the DTB, but apparently, it has corrupted it anyway.
> 
> I will try to figure out what's going on here.

Do you need to have kaslr_offset beyond the uncompressed
kernel size maybe?

> Thanks again for taking the time,

No problem, I'm happy to test these changes.

Regards,

Tony