From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:25:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 04/11] soc: renesas: rcar-sysc: add R8A77970 support In-Reply-To: References: <20170912210518.203740259@cogentembedded.com> Message-ID: <20170915072504.GA3924@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:36:23AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Sergei, > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Sergei Shtylyov > wrote: > > Add support for R-Car V3M (R8A77970) SoC power areas to the R-Car SYSC > > driver. > > > > Based on the original (and large) patch by Daisuke Matsushita > > . > > > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Barinov > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ renesas/drivers/soc/renesas/r8a77970-sysc.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ > > > +#include > > I think this include is no longer needed since commit c7acec713d14c6ce > ("kernel.h: handle pointers to arrays better in container_of()"). > > > +static const struct rcar_sysc_area r8a77970_areas[] __initconst = { > > > + { "a3ir", 0x180, 0, R8A77970_PD_A3IR, R8A77970_PD_ALWAYS_ON }, > > + { "a2ir0", 0x400, 0, R8A77970_PD_A2IR0, R8A77970_PD_ALWAYS_ON }, > > + { "a2ir1", 0x400, 1, R8A77970_PD_A2IR1, R8A77970_PD_A2IR0 }, > > + { "a2ir2", 0x400, 2, R8A77970_PD_A2IR2, R8A77970_PD_A2IR0 }, > > + { "a2ir3", 0x400, 3, R8A77970_PD_A2IR3, R8A77970_PD_A2IR0 }, > > + { "a2sc0", 0x400, 4, R8A77970_PD_A2SC0, R8A77970_PD_ALWAYS_ON }, > > + { "a2sc1", 0x400, 5, R8A77970_PD_A2SC1, R8A77970_PD_A2SC0 }, > > According to Figure 9.2(b) "Power domain structure (R-Car V3M)" and Table 9.4 > "Power domains", all of A2IR[0-3] and A2SC[01] are direct children of A3IR. > > BTW, the bit indices "4" resp. "5" for A2SC[01] don't match Section 9.2.5 > "Power Control Registers for A2IR" (which uses "0" resp. "1"), but I assume > that's just a typo in the datasheet, as those would conflict with A2IR[01], and > the would conflict with the documentation for other R-Car Gen3 SoCs. > > With the above fixed: > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Sergei, please address Geert's review and repost when you are ready. I believe patches 1-3 of this series have been applied. I have marked patches 4 (this one) onwards as "Changes Requested" indicating that I expect all those patches to be reposted when you are ready.