From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:23:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec In-Reply-To: <20170919152253.tvj3hheggrx4lgig@dell> References: <20170913193723.16234-1-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <20170913193723.16234-3-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <20170914074146.dnibkvom4yuzejf3@dell> <20170914074300.iobuwn2hrmnf6sen@dell> <20170914160453.gys3imt4eobckcrq@sirena.org.uk> <20170918085236.z6gmgrwvsjvvc4cd@dell> <20170919121539.mz2mettkefxf3oer@sirena.co.uk> <20170919152253.tvj3hheggrx4lgig@dell> Message-ID: <20170919152349.2dks77acrnv27mto@dell> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:52:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > Change of plan. It looks like there are deps. > > > > > > > Unapplied. > > > > > > The core stuff went in during the merge window, you should be able to > > > > wait for -rc1 or pick up the asoc-v4.14 tag. > > > > > No, I mean patches; 3, 4, 5 and 7 depend on this file. > > > > Right, but I'd have expected a pull request more than the patch being > > unapplied? > > Normally I wait until all patches patches in the set have been > reviewed (the ASOC ones still have not), then ask the OP and the > other affected Maintainers how they want to deal with the patch. > Far more often than not, the the solution is just to take the set > through the MFD tree. > > However, since this is a new driver, you can just take it with my: > > Acked-by: Lee Jones ... although that does mean that you'll have to handle one of the Input patches too. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog