From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] ACPI: IORT: Skip SMMUv3 device ID map for two steps mappings
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:53:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170922125334.GC3475@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505999838-52530-4-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 09:17:17PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>
> IORT revision C introduced SMMUv3 MSI support which adding a
> device ID mapping index in SMMUv3 sub table, to get the SMMUv3
> device ID mapping for the output ID (dev ID for ITS) and the
> link to which ITS.
>
> So if a platform supports SMMUv3 MSI for control interrupt,
> there will be a additional single map entry under SMMU, this
> will not introduce any difference for devices just use one
> step map to get its output ID and parent (ITS or SMMU), such
> as PCI/NC/PMCG ---> ITS or PCI/NC ---> SMMU, but we need to
> do the special handling for two steps map case such as
> PCI/NC--->SMMUv3--->ITS.
>
> Take a PCI hostbridge for example,
>
> |----------------------|
> | Root Complex Node |
> |----------------------|
> | map entry[x] |
> |----------------------|
> | id value |
> | output_reference |
> |---|------------------|
> |
> | |----------------------|
> |-->| SMMUv3 |
> |----------------------|
> | SMMU dev ID |
> | mapping index 0 |
> |----------------------|
> | map entry[0] |
> |----------------------|
> | id value |
> | output_reference-----------> ITS 1 (SMMU MSI domain)
> |----------------------|
> | map entry[1] |
> |----------------------|
> | id value |
> | output_reference-----------> ITS 2 (PCI MSI domain)
> |----------------------|
>
> When the SMMU dev ID mapping index is 0, there is entry[0]
> to map to a ITS, we need to skip that map entry for PCI
> or NC (named component), or we may get the wrong ITS parent.
We do skip it because it is a single mapping that it is currently
not allowed for SMMUv3 components, right ?
Ok, we barf with a printk log message if we encounter such mapping
but the mapping won't resolve to the SMMUv3 MSI in the current
kernel.
Anyway, I think patch 3 and patch 4 should be partially squashed,
more about that in patch 4 comments.
Lorenzo
> For now we have two APIs for ID mapping, iort_node_map_id()
> and iort_node_map_platform_id(), and iort_node_map_id() is
> used for optional two steps mapping, so we just need to
> skip the map entry in iort_node_map_id() for non-SMMUv3
> devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index db71d7f..269959e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -366,6 +366,34 @@ struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node_get_id(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static int iort_get_smmu_v3_id_mapping_index(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> + u32 *index)
> +{
> + struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *smmu;
> +
> + /*
> + * SMMUv3 dev ID mapping index was introdueced in revision 1
> + * table, not avaible in revision 0
> + */
> + if (node->revision < 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + smmu = (struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *)node->node_data;
> + /* if any of the gsi for control interrupts is not 0, ignore the MSI */
> + if (smmu->event_gsiv || smmu->pri_gsiv || smmu->gerr_gsiv
> + || smmu->sync_gsiv)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (smmu->id_mapping_index >= node->mapping_count) {
> + pr_err(FW_BUG "[node %p type %d] ID mapping index overflows valid mappings\n",
> + node, node->type);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + *index = smmu->id_mapping_index;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node_map_id(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> u32 id_in, u32 *id_out,
> u8 type_mask)
> @@ -375,7 +403,9 @@ static struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node_map_id(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> /* Parse the ID mapping tree to find specified node type */
> while (node) {
> struct acpi_iort_id_mapping *map;
> - int i;
> + int i, ret = -EINVAL;
> + /* big enough for an invalid id index in practical */
> + u32 index = U32_MAX;
>
> if (IORT_TYPE_MASK(node->type) & type_mask) {
> if (id_out)
> @@ -396,8 +426,19 @@ static struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node_map_id(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> goto fail_map;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * we need to get SMMUv3 dev ID mapping index and skip its
> + * associated ID map for single mapping cases.
> + */
> + if (node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3)
> + ret = iort_get_smmu_v3_id_mapping_index(node, &index);
> +
> /* Do the ID translation */
> for (i = 0; i < node->mapping_count; i++, map++) {
> + /* if it's a SMMUv3 device id mapping index, skip it */
> + if (!ret && i == index)
> + continue;
> +
> if (!iort_id_map(map, node->type, id, &id))
> break;
> }
> --
> 1.7.12.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-22 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-21 13:17 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] IORT SMMUv3 MSI support Hanjun Guo
2017-09-21 13:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] ACPICA: Add SMMUv3 device ID mapping index support Hanjun Guo
2017-09-22 11:25 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-09-21 13:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] ACPI: IORT: lookup iort node via fwnode Hanjun Guo
2017-09-21 13:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] ACPI: IORT: Skip SMMUv3 device ID map for two steps mappings Hanjun Guo
2017-09-22 12:53 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-09-26 21:39 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-09-22 13:21 ` Robin Murphy
2017-09-26 19:04 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-09-21 13:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] ACPI: IORT: SMMUv3 nodes MSI support Hanjun Guo
2017-09-22 13:07 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-09-27 0:34 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-09-22 11:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] IORT SMMUv3 " Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170922125334.GC3475@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).