From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:14:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 07/10] mfd: axp20x: add pinctrl cell for AXP813 In-Reply-To: <5345a2e94013f4e4f7b545cd4d84b098bd2fa349.1506428208.git-series.quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> References: <5345a2e94013f4e4f7b545cd4d84b098bd2fa349.1506428208.git-series.quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20170926131445.xo2uawiovjtmyivj@flea> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:17:17PM +0000, Quentin Schulz wrote: > As pinctrl and GPIO driver now supports AXP813, add a cell for it. > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz > --- > drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c > index 336de66..a457528 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c > @@ -876,6 +876,9 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp813_cells[] = { > .name = "axp221-pek", > .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp803_pek_resources), > .resources = axp803_pek_resources, > + }, { > + .name = "axp20x-gpio", > + .of_compatible = "x-powers,axp813-pctl", This was probably introduced in the previous driver, but why are you using the pctl suffix? Can't we just use the GPIO one to remain consistent with the previous users and the datasheet? Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: