From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: matthijsvanduin@gmail.com (Matthijs van Duin)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:56:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: bus: Minimal TI sysc interconnect
 target module binding
In-Reply-To: <20170925174413.GH4394@atomide.com>
References: <20170920224621.16236-1-tony@atomide.com>
 <20170920224621.16236-2-tony@atomide.com>
 <20170925063545.nn3gr5drea6o2g6m@squirrel.local>
 <20170925142520.GE4394@atomide.com>
 <20170925172120.xu6k3leg4ac6mjya@squirrel.local>
 <20170925174413.GH4394@atomide.com>
Message-ID: <20170927095646.fi4l7jbbvrubfe25@squirrel.local>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:44:14AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com> [170925 10:22]:
> > Ah... three "foreign" modules with an idlemode carelessly thrown into a
> > register without care for existing layouts.  I think these are more just
> > exceptional cases which happen to agree by coincidence since they all
> > just added idlemode in the simplest way possible, but I can understand
> > how it came to be viewed as a standard type.
> 
> So we shall then name this fine centauroid sysc ti,81xx-sysc?

There's nothing centauroid specific about this, mcasp on omap4 has it too.

Matthijs