From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:51:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: bus: Minimal TI sysc interconnect target module binding In-Reply-To: <20170927095646.fi4l7jbbvrubfe25@squirrel.local> References: <20170920224621.16236-1-tony@atomide.com> <20170920224621.16236-2-tony@atomide.com> <20170925063545.nn3gr5drea6o2g6m@squirrel.local> <20170925142520.GE4394@atomide.com> <20170925172120.xu6k3leg4ac6mjya@squirrel.local> <20170925174413.GH4394@atomide.com> <20170927095646.fi4l7jbbvrubfe25@squirrel.local> Message-ID: <20170929175153.GJ4394@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Matthijs van Duin [170927 02:57]: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:44:14AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Matthijs van Duin [170925 10:22]: > > > Ah... three "foreign" modules with an idlemode carelessly thrown into a > > > register without care for existing layouts. I think these are more just > > > exceptional cases which happen to agree by coincidence since they all > > > just added idlemode in the simplest way possible, but I can understand > > > how it came to be viewed as a standard type. > > > > So we shall then name this fine centauroid sysc ti,81xx-sysc? > > There's nothing centauroid specific about this, mcasp on omap4 has it too. OK and for that we have ti,sysc-mcasp. We can call the generic one ti,sysc-omap4-simple. Regards, Tony