From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: acme@redhat.com (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 13:49:30 -0300 Subject: [PATCH v5 6/7] drivers/perf: Add support for ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension In-Reply-To: <20171002141405.GC12847@arm.com> References: <1506607791-8621-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <1506607791-8621-7-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <20170929171940.2aa33d00463b1e9c987aea15@arm.com> <20171002141405.GC12847@arm.com> Message-ID: <20171002164930.GB2121@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Em Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 03:14:05PM +0100, Will Deacon escreveu: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:19:40PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 15:09:50 +0100 > > Will Deacon wrote: > > > + if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event) & SYS_PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0) > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > + if (attr->exclude_idle) > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > "PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts." will be > > printed if the user didn't specify a sample period. Otherwise, a > > string with "/bin/dmesg may provide additional information." will be > > printed. > > I was hoping for a response from acme by now for this: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-perf-users/msg04066.html > > Alas, nothing. Looking at the #ifdef x86 in evsel.c, I'm guessing > > it'll be ok, although I'm still not sure how PMU-specific we can get in > > evsel.c, nor whether it's ok to communicate lists of h/w supported > > sample periods through /sys/bus/event_source/devices/... > > > > acme? OK to refactor evsel messaging for Arm, including parsing for > > which PMUs are being used, so customize the message? > > Arnaldo's probably got enough on his plate maintaining perf tool, so my > advice would be to post a patch as an RFC and use that as a concrete basis > for discussion. It often works out better starting with code, even if none > of it ends up getting merged (and you can include bits of your email above > in the cover letter). I'm all for more informative messages, and if you guys agree on how to provide the info in a way that combined with logic in evsel.c, I'd say do what Will suggested, post a patch series and include usage examples, before and after. - Arnaldo