From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 12:34:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser In-Reply-To: <20171008120950.5232a71f@bbrezillon> References: <1502743720-28672-1-git-send-email-andrea.adami@gmail.com> <20170821221339.70cfcfb7@bbrezillon> <87pobmoz8n.fsf@belgarion.home> <20170824114631.089d2628@bbrezillon> <87inh6pw9e.fsf@belgarion.home> <87376uezjs.fsf@belgarion.home> <20171008120950.5232a71f@bbrezillon> Message-ID: <20171008123447.54a3d0ad@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 12:09:50 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 11:53:11 +0200 > Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > > > > Boris Brezillon writes: > > > > > >> Hi Robert, > > >> Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on > > >> patch 1 (it's not a build dependency, but NAND partitioning might be > > >> wrong if you apply them), so we need to sync. What release is > > >> pxa/for-next targeting? If it's 4.15 I can apply patch 1 just after > > >> 4.14-rc1 is out and provide an immutable branch for you to pull in > > >> pxa/for-next. > > > > > > Hi Boris, > > > > > > It's targeting 4.15 right now. And we can do as you like, either an immutable > > > branch, or I wait to include these patches into my pxa/for-next until you give > > > me your go, it's as you like. > > > > Hi Boris, > > > > So what's the status about the sync, should I pick the patches, and have the > > others make it to your for-next branch ? > > I'm still waiting Brian's final word about this version, and if he's > happy with it, Richard will queue it for 4.15. Actually, I'm waiting a feedback on v9 [1], not v5. [1]http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/808431/