linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ACPI: IORT: Skip SMMUv3 device ID map for two steps mappings
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:20:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010092036.GA8507@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGHbJ3DbuGeKH16zr+PdZYjoaZrHJrTmV5tmMxZ5CDPObErUCQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 02:47:53PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply, holidays in China for the past week.
> 
> At 2017/9/27 21:54, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Hanjun,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 09:20:14AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> IORT revision C introduced SMMUv3 MSI support which adding a
> >> device ID mapping index in SMMUv3 sub table, to get the SMMUv3
> >> device ID mapping for the output ID (dev ID for ITS) and the
> >> link to which ITS.
> >>
> >> So if a platform supports SMMUv3 MSI for control interrupt,
> >> there will be a additional single map entry under SMMU, this
> >> will not introduce any difference for devices just use one
> >> step map to get its output ID and parent (ITS or SMMU), such
> >> as PCI/NC/PMCG ---> ITS or PCI/NC ---> SMMU, but we need to
> >> do the special handling for two steps map case such as
> >> PCI/NC--->SMMUv3--->ITS.
> >>
> >> Take a PCI hostbridge for example,
> >>
> >> |----------------------|
> >> |  Root Complex Node   |
> >> |----------------------|
> >> |    map entry[x]      |
> >> |----------------------|
> >> |       id value       |
> >> | output_reference     |
> >> |---|------------------|
> >>      |
> >>      |   |----------------------|
> >>      |-->|        SMMUv3        |
> >>          |----------------------|
> >>          |     SMMU dev ID      |
> >>          |     mapping index 0  |
> >>          |----------------------|
> >>          |      map entry[0]    |
> >>          |----------------------|
> >>          |       id value       |
> >>          | output_reference-----------> ITS 1 (SMMU MSI domain)
> >>          |----------------------|
> >>          |      map entry[1]    |
> >>          |----------------------|
> >>          |       id value       |
> >>          | output_reference-----------> ITS 2 (PCI MSI domain)
> >>          |----------------------|
> >>
> >> When the SMMU dev ID mapping index is 0, there is entry[0]
> >> to map to a ITS, we need to skip that map entry for PCI
> >> or NC (named component), or we may get the wrong ITS parent.
> >
> > Is this actually true ? I think that currently we would simply skip
> > the entry and print an error log but we can't get a wrong ITS parent.
> 
> So the only valid single mapping under type SMMUv3 is SMMUv3's dev id
> mapping, we need to fix the IORT spec as well.
> 
> >
> > I am rewriting this commit (I will probably split it), it is doing the
> > right thing but the commit log is stale (probably caused by code
> > reshuffling).
> 
> Do I need to resend another version, or you can help to update it?
> please let me know.

I reworked the patches, you can repost/retest them I made them available
in the branch below, we will have to add a guard around ACPICA smmu
struct (unfortunately I think we will have to use the ACPICA version as
a guard) or I can ask Rafael to pull the series if ACPICA goes via ACPI
tree (and your patch made it into the release - I will check ACPICA
upstream).

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/linux.git iort/smmu-msi-for-4.15

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-10  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-27  1:20 [PATCH 0/4] IORT SMMUv3 MSI support Hanjun Guo
2017-09-27  1:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPICA: Add SMMUv3 device ID mapping index support Hanjun Guo
2017-09-27  1:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: IORT: lookup iort node via fwnode Hanjun Guo
2017-09-27  1:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI: IORT: Skip SMMUv3 device ID map for two steps mappings Hanjun Guo
2017-09-27 13:54   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-10  6:47     ` Hanjun Guo
2017-10-10  9:20       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-10-11  5:26         ` Hanjun Guo
2017-10-11 10:24           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-12  7:30             ` Hanjun Guo
2017-10-12  9:50               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-09-27  1:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: IORT: SMMUv3 nodes MSI support Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171010092036.GA8507@red-moon \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).