From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ACPI: IORT: Skip SMMUv3 device ID map for two steps mappings
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:20:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010092036.GA8507@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGHbJ3DbuGeKH16zr+PdZYjoaZrHJrTmV5tmMxZ5CDPObErUCQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 02:47:53PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, holidays in China for the past week.
>
> At 2017/9/27 21:54, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Hanjun,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 09:20:14AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> IORT revision C introduced SMMUv3 MSI support which adding a
> >> device ID mapping index in SMMUv3 sub table, to get the SMMUv3
> >> device ID mapping for the output ID (dev ID for ITS) and the
> >> link to which ITS.
> >>
> >> So if a platform supports SMMUv3 MSI for control interrupt,
> >> there will be a additional single map entry under SMMU, this
> >> will not introduce any difference for devices just use one
> >> step map to get its output ID and parent (ITS or SMMU), such
> >> as PCI/NC/PMCG ---> ITS or PCI/NC ---> SMMU, but we need to
> >> do the special handling for two steps map case such as
> >> PCI/NC--->SMMUv3--->ITS.
> >>
> >> Take a PCI hostbridge for example,
> >>
> >> |----------------------|
> >> | Root Complex Node |
> >> |----------------------|
> >> | map entry[x] |
> >> |----------------------|
> >> | id value |
> >> | output_reference |
> >> |---|------------------|
> >> |
> >> | |----------------------|
> >> |-->| SMMUv3 |
> >> |----------------------|
> >> | SMMU dev ID |
> >> | mapping index 0 |
> >> |----------------------|
> >> | map entry[0] |
> >> |----------------------|
> >> | id value |
> >> | output_reference-----------> ITS 1 (SMMU MSI domain)
> >> |----------------------|
> >> | map entry[1] |
> >> |----------------------|
> >> | id value |
> >> | output_reference-----------> ITS 2 (PCI MSI domain)
> >> |----------------------|
> >>
> >> When the SMMU dev ID mapping index is 0, there is entry[0]
> >> to map to a ITS, we need to skip that map entry for PCI
> >> or NC (named component), or we may get the wrong ITS parent.
> >
> > Is this actually true ? I think that currently we would simply skip
> > the entry and print an error log but we can't get a wrong ITS parent.
>
> So the only valid single mapping under type SMMUv3 is SMMUv3's dev id
> mapping, we need to fix the IORT spec as well.
>
> >
> > I am rewriting this commit (I will probably split it), it is doing the
> > right thing but the commit log is stale (probably caused by code
> > reshuffling).
>
> Do I need to resend another version, or you can help to update it?
> please let me know.
I reworked the patches, you can repost/retest them I made them available
in the branch below, we will have to add a guard around ACPICA smmu
struct (unfortunately I think we will have to use the ACPICA version as
a guard) or I can ask Rafael to pull the series if ACPICA goes via ACPI
tree (and your patch made it into the release - I will check ACPICA
upstream).
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/linux.git iort/smmu-msi-for-4.15
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-27 1:20 [PATCH 0/4] IORT SMMUv3 MSI support Hanjun Guo
2017-09-27 1:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPICA: Add SMMUv3 device ID mapping index support Hanjun Guo
2017-09-27 1:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: IORT: lookup iort node via fwnode Hanjun Guo
2017-09-27 1:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI: IORT: Skip SMMUv3 device ID map for two steps mappings Hanjun Guo
2017-09-27 13:54 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-10 6:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-10-10 9:20 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-10-11 5:26 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-10-11 10:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-12 7:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-10-12 9:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-09-27 1:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: IORT: SMMUv3 nodes MSI support Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171010092036.GA8507@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).