From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] SMMUv3 CMD_SYNC optimisation
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 20:05:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171013190521.GD30572@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1504182142.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:44:24PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Since Nate reported a reasonable performance boost from the out-of-line
> MSI polling in v1 [1], I've now implemented the equivalent for cons
> polling as well - that has been boot-tested on D05 with some trivial I/O
> and at least doesn't seem to lock up or explode. There's also a little
> cosmetic tweaking to make the patches a bit cleaner as a series.
>
> Robin.
>
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org/msg19657.html
>
> Robin Murphy (5):
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Specialise CMD_SYNC handling
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Forget about cmdq-sync interrupt
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use CMD_SYNC completion interrupt
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Poll for CMD_SYNC outside cmdq lock
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use burst-polling for sync completion
What's this final mythical patch about? I don't see it in the series.
Anyway, the first two patches look fine to me, but this doesn't apply
on top of my iommu/devel branch so they will need rebasing.
Cheers,
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-13 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-31 13:44 [PATCH v2 0/4] SMMUv3 CMD_SYNC optimisation Robin Murphy
2017-08-31 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Specialise CMD_SYNC handling Robin Murphy
2017-08-31 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Forget about cmdq-sync interrupt Robin Murphy
2017-08-31 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use CMD_SYNC completion MSI Robin Murphy
2017-10-13 18:32 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-16 12:25 ` Robin Murphy
2017-08-31 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Poll for CMD_SYNC outside cmdq lock Robin Murphy
2017-10-13 18:59 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-16 13:12 ` Robin Murphy
2017-08-31 13:44 ` [RFT] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use burst-polling for sync completion Robin Murphy
2017-10-13 19:05 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-10-16 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] SMMUv3 CMD_SYNC optimisation Robin Murphy
2017-10-16 15:02 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171013190521.GD30572@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).