From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 15:37:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: NOMMU: MPU updates In-Reply-To: <0edd802a-d596-5d46-ff53-97b1db1a453e@arm.com> References: <1506330344-31556-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> <68a6eb4d-4d8e-7c6a-0875-3165bde8de89@arm.com> <20171013092418.GF20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <0edd802a-d596-5d46-ff53-97b1db1a453e@arm.com> Message-ID: <20171014143721.GH20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:40:39AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > On 13/10/17 10:24, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > Sorry, but I have no working MPS3 platform since it killed its uSD card > > with all the FPGA bitstreams on. I'm waiting (since end of September) > > for a replacement from ARM Ltd but there hasn't yet been any progress. > > > > Sure, I can replace the uSD card myself, but the problem is the contents > > of the card. > > Thanks for prompt reply! > > I should say that board won't help you with testing this series since it > implements different MPU model (I have patches for that too but they are > on top of this series). It assists as far as making sure the changes don't cause a regression for the platform. > I've been working closely with Alex and Andr?s (since they needed this for > their Cortex-M7 platform) to make sure it works as expected. It was also > tested with R-class FastModels. > > I intentionally kept CONFIG_ARM_MPU disabled by default for M-class > (PATCH 6/8), so it won't interfere with existing bootloaders. It looks like patch 6 will allow me to select ARM_MPU for the MPS3 config (by way of CPU_V7M being enabled). As I'm unable to test what effect that has here, and I don't know when I'll be able to do so, please check if not already done so. > I'd be glad if you can review the series and give it a chance to sit in > linux-next (I can provide a branch on top of yours for-next). Please never provide a branch on top of my for-next, it's an "unstable" commit in that it's regenerated from several sub-branches (fixes, misc, devel-stable, and whatever other work I want to include in linux-next.) -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up