[PATCH v2] ARM: imx: Enable cpuidle for i.MX6DL starting at 1.1

[PATCH v2] ARM: imx: Enable cpuidle for i.MX6DL starting at 1.1

[Leonard Crestez]

Enable cpuidle support on i.MX6DL starting from IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1.

This also makes the code cleaner because 6q and 6dl actually have
different revision histories.

Signed-off-by: Bai Ping <ping.bai@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
---

Changes since v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg610461.html
* Clarified comment but kept > instead of >= because that's what the
old code used. Would be OK to change with further feedback.

 arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
index 45801b2..5707113 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
@@ -371,10 +371,13 @@ static struct platform_device imx6q_cpufreq_pdev = {
 static void __init imx6q_init_late(void)
 {
 	/*
-	 * WAIT mode is broken on TO 1.0 and 1.1, so there is no point
-	 * to run cpuidle on them.
+	 * WAIT mode is broken on imx6 Dual/Quad revision 1.0 and 1.1 so
+	 * there is no point to run cpuidle on them.
+	 *
+	 * It does work on imx6 Solo/DualLite starting from 1.1
 	 */
-	if (imx_get_soc_revision() > IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1)
+	if ((cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() > IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1) ||
+	    (cpu_is_imx6dl() && imx_get_soc_revision() > IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0))
 		imx6q_cpuidle_init();
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH v2] ARM: imx: Enable cpuidle for i.MX6DL starting at 1.1

[Lucas Stach]

Am Mittwoch, den 11.10.2017, 15:08 +0300 schrieb Leonard Crestez:
> Enable cpuidle support on i.MX6DL starting from
> IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1.
> 
> This also makes the code cleaner because 6q and 6dl actually have
> different revision histories.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bai Ping <ping.bai@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>

Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>

> ---
> 
> Changes since v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg610461.
> html
> * Clarified comment but kept > instead of >= because that's what the
> old code used. Would be OK to change with further feedback.
> 
> ?arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 9 ++++++---
> ?1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-
> imx6q.c
> index 45801b2..5707113 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
> @@ -371,10 +371,13 @@ static struct platform_device
> imx6q_cpufreq_pdev = {
> ?static void __init imx6q_init_late(void)
> ?{
> ?	/*
> -	?* WAIT mode is broken on TO 1.0 and 1.1, so there is no
> point
> -	?* to run cpuidle on them.
> +	?* WAIT mode is broken on imx6 Dual/Quad revision 1.0 and
> 1.1 so
> +	?* there is no point to run cpuidle on them.
> +	?*
> +	?* It does work on imx6 Solo/DualLite starting from 1.1
> ?	?*/
> -	if (imx_get_soc_revision() > IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1)
> +	if ((cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() >
> IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1) ||
> +	????(cpu_is_imx6dl() && imx_get_soc_revision() >
> IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0))
> ?		imx6q_cpuidle_init();
> ?
> ?	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {

[PATCH v2] ARM: imx: Enable cpuidle for i.MX6DL starting at 1.1

[Shawn Guo]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 03:08:23PM +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> Enable cpuidle support on i.MX6DL starting from IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1.
> 
> This also makes the code cleaner because 6q and 6dl actually have
> different revision histories.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bai Ping <ping.bai@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>

Applied, thanks.