From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] arm/arm64: KVM: limit icache invalidation to prefetch aborts
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:59:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171016205916.GP1845@lvm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171009152032.27804-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:20:22PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It was recently reported that on a VM restore, we seem to spend a
> disproportionate amount of time invalidation the icache. This is
> partially due to some HW behaviour, but also because we're being a bit
> dumb and are invalidating the icache for every page we map at S2, even
> if that on a data access.
>
> The slightly better way of doing this is to mark the pages XN at S2,
> and wait for the the guest to execute something in that page, at which
> point we perform the invalidation. As it is likely that there is a lot
> less instruction than data, we win (or so we hope).
>
> We also take this opportunity to drop the extra dcache clean to the
> PoU which is pretty useless, as we already clean all the way to the
> PoC...
>
> Running a bare metal test that touches 1GB of memory (using a 4kB
> stride) leads to the following results on Seattle:
>
> 4.13:
> do_fault_read.bin: 0.565885992 seconds time elapsed
> do_fault_write.bin: 0.738296337 seconds time elapsed
> do_fault_read_write.bin: 1.241812231 seconds time elapsed
>
> 4.14-rc3+patches:
> do_fault_read.bin: 0.244961803 seconds time elapsed
> do_fault_write.bin: 0.422740092 seconds time elapsed
> do_fault_read_write.bin: 0.643402470 seconds time elapsed
>
> We're almost halving the time of something that more or less looks
> like a restore operation. Some larger systems will show much bigger
> benefits as they become less impacted by the icache invalidation
> (which is broadcast in the inner shareable domain).
>
> I've also given it a test run on both Cubietruck and Jetson-TK1.
>
> Tests are archived here:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/kvm-ws-tests.git/
>
> I'd value some additional test results on HW I don't have access to.
>
What would also be interesting is some insight into how big the hit then
is on first execution, but that should in no way gate merging these
patches.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-16 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 15:20 [PATCH 00/10] arm/arm64: KVM: limit icache invalidation to prefetch aborts Marc Zyngier
2017-10-09 15:20 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Split dcache/icache flushing Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 20:07 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 8:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-17 14:28 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 14:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 21:35 ` Roy Franz (Cavium)
2017-10-17 6:44 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-09 15:20 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm64: KVM: Add invalidate_icache_range helper Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 20:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-19 16:47 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-20 13:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-09 15:20 ` [PATCH 03/10] arm: KVM: Add optimized PIPT icache flushing Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 20:07 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 9:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-17 14:34 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-09 15:20 ` [PATCH 04/10] arm64: KVM: PTE/PMD S2 XN bit definition Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 20:07 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-09 15:20 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Limit icache invalidation to prefetch aborts Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 20:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-09 15:20 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Only clean the dcache on translation fault Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 20:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 9:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-17 14:36 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 14:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-09 15:20 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Preserve Exec permission across R/W permission faults Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 20:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 11:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-17 14:46 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 15:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-09 15:20 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Drop vcpu parameter from coherent_{d, i}cache_guest_page Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 20:08 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Drop vcpu parameter from coherent_{d,i}cache_guest_page Christoffer Dall
2017-10-09 15:20 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Detangle kvm_mmu.h from kvm_hyp.h Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 20:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-09 15:20 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm: KVM: Use common implementation for all flushes to PoC Marc Zyngier
2017-10-16 20:06 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 12:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-17 14:48 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-16 20:59 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171016205916.GP1845@lvm \
--to=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).