From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:06:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v12 08/11] arm64/kasan: add and use kasan_map_populate() In-Reply-To: References: <20171013173214.27300-1-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> <20171013173214.27300-9-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> <0ae84532-8dcb-10aa-9d69-79d7025b089e@virtuozzo.com> Message-ID: <20171018170651.GG21820@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 01:03:10PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > I asked Will, about it, and he preferred to have this patched added to the > end of my series instead of replacing "arm64/kasan: add and use > kasan_map_populate()". As I said, I'm fine either way, I just didn't want to cause extra work or rebasing: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-October/535703.html > In addition, Will's patch stops using large pages for kasan memory, and thus > might add some regression in which case it is easier to revert just that > patch instead of the whole series. It is unlikely that regression is going > to be detectable, because kasan by itself makes system quiet slow already. If it causes problems, I'll just fix them. No need to revert. Will