From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:22:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018192241.GL8900@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018150004.GA19485@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 04:00:05PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 03:23:23PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:31:42PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 01:50:24PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:38:39PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > > > Until KVM has full SVE support, guests must not be allowed to
> > > > > execute SVE instructions.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch enables the necessary traps, and also ensures that the
> > > > > traps are disabled again on exit from the guest so that the host
> > > > > can still use SVE if it wants to.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch introduces another instance of
> > > > > __this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL), so this flush operation
> > > > > is abstracted out as a separate helper fpsimd_flush_cpu_state().
> > > > > Other instances are ported appropriately.
> > > >
> > > > I don't understand this paragraph, beginning from ", so this...".
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From reading the code, what I think is the reason for having to flush
> > > > the SVE state (and mark the host state invalid) is that even though we
> > > > disallow SVE usage in the guest, the guest can use the normal FP state,
> > > > and while we always fully preserve the host state, this could still
> > > > corrupt some additional SVE state not properly preserved for the host.
> > > > Is that correct?
> > >
> > > Yes, that's right: the guest can't touch the SVE-specific registers
> > > Pn/FFR, but FPSIMD accesses to Vn regs cause the high bits of the
> > > corresponding SVE Zn registers to be clobbered. In any case, the
> > > FPSIMD restore done by KVM after guest exit is sufficient to clobber
> > > those bits even if the guest didn't do it.
> > >
> > > This is a band-aid for not making the KVM world switch code properly
> > > SVE-aware yet.
> > >
> > > Does the following wording sound better:
> > >
> > > --8<--
> > >
> > > On guest exit, high bits of the SVE Zn registers may have been
> > > clobbered as a side-effect the execution of FPSIMD instructions in
> > > the guest. The existing KVM host FPSIMD restore code is not
> > > sufficient to restore these bits, so this patch explicitly marks
> > > the CPU as not containing cached vector state for any task, this
> > > forcing a reload on the next return to userspace. This is an
> > > interim measure, in advance of adding full SVE awareness to KVM.
> > >
> > > Because of the duplication of this operation
> > > (__this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL)), it is factored out as
> >
> > s/it is/is/ (I think)
> >
> > > a new helper fpsimd_flush_cpu_state() to make the purpose clearer.
> >
> > Yes, the wording is good and helps a lot. Thanks for writing that.
> >
>
> I think it "it is" is correct, but it's a pretty ghastly sentence...
Ah, I missed the comma, before and read it as __this_cpu_write... is
factored... but that doesn't make any sense. Sorry, I was just not
paying proper attention.
>
> I'll split it as:
>
> This marking of cached vector state in the CPU as invalid is done using
> __this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL) in fpsimd.c. Due to the
> repeated use of this rather obscure operation, it makes sense to factor
> it out as a separate helper with a clearer name. This patch factors it
> out as fpsimd_flush_cpu_state().
>
That's definitely clear.
> > Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
>
> I'll assume I can keep keep your Reviewed-by, since this change is just
> clarification.
>
> But if you're not happy, please shout!
>
I'm happy - in most aspects of life - indeed keep my reviewed-by.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-10 18:38 [PATCH v3 00/28] ARM Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) Dave Martin
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 01/28] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets Dave Martin
2017-10-11 14:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-11 14:45 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests Dave Martin
2017-10-11 14:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-11 16:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-17 13:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 14:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-18 13:20 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 14:45 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-18 19:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 03/28] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-10-11 14:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-11 14:35 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 04/28] arm64: Port deprecated instruction emulation to new sysctl interface Dave Martin
2017-10-11 14:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 05/28] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set, clear}_ti_thread_flag() Dave Martin
2017-10-11 14:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 06/28] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions Dave Martin
2017-10-11 14:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 07/28] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions Dave Martin
2017-10-11 14:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-11 14:39 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 08/28] arm64/sve: Kconfig update and conditional compilation support Dave Martin
2017-10-11 14:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 09/28] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition Dave Martin
2017-10-11 14:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup Dave Martin
2017-10-11 14:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling Dave Martin
2017-10-11 16:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-12 16:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-13 13:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-13 17:53 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 12/28] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes Dave Martin
2017-10-11 16:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support Dave Martin
2017-10-11 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-12 16:11 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-13 11:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-13 14:26 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length Dave Martin
2017-10-11 16:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 15/28] arm64: cpufeature: Move sys_caps_initialised declarations Dave Martin
2017-10-11 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths Dave Martin
2017-10-11 16:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-12 12:56 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-10-16 15:46 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-16 16:27 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-10-16 16:44 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-16 16:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-10-16 16:55 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-16 16:58 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 17/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around kernel-mode NEON use Dave Martin
2017-10-12 10:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls Dave Martin
2017-10-12 10:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support Dave Martin
2017-10-12 17:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-13 16:16 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-18 10:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-18 16:02 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 20/28] arm64/sve: Add prctl controls for userspace vector length management Dave Martin
2017-10-12 17:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 21/28] arm64/sve: Add sysctl to set the default vector length for new processes Dave Martin
2017-10-12 17:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE Dave Martin
2017-10-11 16:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 11:04 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-12 11:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-13 14:15 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-13 14:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-13 16:47 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-12 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-17 11:50 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 14:31 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-18 13:23 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 15:00 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-18 19:22 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution Dave Martin
2017-10-12 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-17 13:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests Dave Martin
2017-10-11 16:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-17 13:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-17 14:07 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-17 14:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-17 15:47 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-18 13:21 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 15:01 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-18 16:49 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 25/28] arm64/sve: Detect SVE and activate runtime support Dave Martin
2017-10-11 17:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-10-12 17:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation Dave Martin
2017-10-11 9:50 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-11 11:08 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-11 11:30 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-13 14:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-13 17:17 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-18 9:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-13 17:35 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 27/28] arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv Dave Martin
2017-10-11 10:19 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-11 13:14 ` Dave P Martin
2017-10-10 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 28/28] arm64/sve: signal: Include SVE when computing AT_MINSIGSTKSZ Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171018192241.GL8900@cbox \
--to=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).