From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:54:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: compressed: discard ksym/kcrctab input section In-Reply-To: References: <874lr4d8gm.fsf@free-electrons.com> <20171012094517.GB20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <878tg56dtn.fsf@free-electrons.com> <20171020161133.GG20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <20171020163207.GH20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20171020165433.GI20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:36:08PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Why would you have to choose between these patches? You can simply > apply mine as a bug fix, and postpone the le_struct.h discussion for > the next cycle. It's not a choice between these two patches. I think we need Arnd's patch, because we know that fixes Romain Izard's problem. If I apply just your patch, then Gregory stops complaining, and there'll be nothing to remind us of this issue - Romain isn't shouting about it. That's a problem, because it's a real bug that then gets forgotten about. Or do we have evidence that your patch fixes Romain Izard's problem as well? I don't see any such suggestion. So, let me go back to the dart board... I just don't have the information to be able to make any decision on this, so stop asking me for a decision on something I know nothing about. Either provide me with some information I can base a decision on, or stop asking for a decision. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up