[PATCH v4 12/20] genirq: Document vcpu_info usage for percpu_devid interrupts

[cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)]

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 04:55:01PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > 
> > > Please Cc lkml when changing genirq core code.
> > > 
> > 
> > ok, will do so in the future.
> > 
> > > > It is currently unclear how to set the VCPU affinity for a percpu_devid
> > > > interrupt , since the Linux irq_data structure describes the state for
> > > > multiple interrupts, one for each physical CPU on the system.  Since
> > > > each such interrupt can be associated with different VCPUs or none at
> > > > all, associating a single VCPU state with such an interrupt does not
> > > > capture the necessary semantics.
> > > > 
> > > > The implementers of irq_set_affinity are the Intel and AMD IOMMUs, and
> > > > the ARM GIC irqchip.  The Intel and AMD callers do not appear to use
> > > > percpu_devid interrupts, and the ARM GIC implementation only checks the
> > > > pointer against NULL vs. non-NULL.
> > > > 
> > > > Therefore, simply update the function documentation to explain the
> > > > expected use in the context of percpu_devid interrupts, allowing future
> > > > changes or additions to irqchip implementers to do the right thing.
> > > > 
> > > > This allows us to set the VCPU affinity for the virtual timer interrupt
> > > > in KVM/ARM, which is a percpu_devid (PPI) interrupt.
> > > 
> > > I have a hard time to understand how adding the comment allows you to set
> > > VCPU affinity ....
> > > 
> > 
> > Obviously everything already works without adding the comment, however
> > it is not entirely clear how to use the vcpu_into for percpu_devid
> > interrupts, and this patch aims to make that clear, as it is the first
> > user of irq_set_vcpu_affinity for a percpu_devid interrupt which
> > actually uses the vcpu_info pointer.
> > 
> > Would you rather that we did not update the documentation or what do you
> > suggest?
> 
> Documentation is welcome of course. I just want a changelog which is not
> misleading. i.e. it says:
> 
>    Update the function documentation .....
> 
>    This allow us to set ....
> 
> Which reads like: Updating the documentation allows us to set ...

Ah, your comment was regarding the commit message.  That's a fair point.
How about:

  This documents the use of the vcpu_info parameter for percpu_devid
  interrupts when setting the VCPU affinity for the virtual timer interrupt
  in KVM/ARM.


Thanks,
-Christoffer