From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/26] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: restructure kvm_vgic_(un)map_phys_irq
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:44:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171025144443.GH91785@lvm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171006153401.5481-3-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 04:33:37PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> We want to reuse the core of the map/unmap functions for IRQ
> forwarding. Let's move the computation of the hwirq in
> kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq and pass the linux IRQ as parameter.
> the host_irq is added to struct vgic_irq.
>
> We introduce kvm_vgic_map/unmap_irq which take a struct vgic_irq
> handle as a parameter.
>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Marc,
I need a signed-off-by from you on this patch.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 8 ++++---
> virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 24 +------------------
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index 34dba516ef24..53f631bdec75 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct vgic_irq {
> bool hw; /* Tied to HW IRQ */
> struct kref refcount; /* Used for LPIs */
> u32 hwintid; /* HW INTID number */
> + unsigned int host_irq; /* linux irq corresponding to hwintid */
> union {
> u8 targets; /* GICv2 target VCPUs mask */
> u32 mpidr; /* GICv3 target VCPU */
> @@ -307,9 +308,10 @@ void kvm_vgic_init_cpu_hardware(void);
>
> int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
> bool level, void *owner);
> -int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 virt_irq, u32 phys_irq);
> -int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq);
> -bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq);
> +int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
> + u32 vintid);
> +int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
> +bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
>
> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> index 8e89d63005c7..b24e2f7b363a 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -647,9 +647,6 @@ int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
> struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu);
> - struct irq_desc *desc;
> - struct irq_data *data;
> - int phys_irq;
> int ret;
>
> if (timer->enabled)
> @@ -667,26 +664,7 @@ int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Find the physical IRQ number corresponding to the host_vtimer_irq
> - */
> - desc = irq_to_desc(host_vtimer_irq);
> - if (!desc) {
> - kvm_err("%s: no interrupt descriptor\n", __func__);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> - while (data->parent_data)
> - data = data->parent_data;
> -
> - phys_irq = data->hwirq;
> -
> - /*
> - * Tell the VGIC that the virtual interrupt is tied to a
> - * physical interrupt. We do that once per VCPU.
> - */
> - ret = kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, vtimer->irq.irq, phys_irq);
> + ret = kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, host_vtimer_irq, vtimer->irq.irq);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index fed717e07938..9d557efd1f7d 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <linux/kvm.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> #include <linux/list_sort.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
>
> #include "vgic.h"
>
> @@ -403,38 +405,66 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 virt_irq, u32 phys_irq)
> +/* @irq->irq_lock must be held */
> +static int kvm_vgic_map_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> + unsigned int host_irq)
> {
> - struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, virt_irq);
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> + struct irq_data *data;
>
> - BUG_ON(!irq);
> -
> - spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + /*
> + * Find the physical IRQ number corresponding to @host_irq
> + */
> + desc = irq_to_desc(host_irq);
> + if (!desc) {
> + kvm_err("%s: no interrupt descriptor\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> + while (data->parent_data)
> + data = data->parent_data;
>
> irq->hw = true;
> - irq->hwintid = phys_irq;
> + irq->host_irq = host_irq;
> + irq->hwintid = data->hwirq;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* @irq->irq_lock must be held */
> +static inline void kvm_vgic_unmap_irq(struct vgic_irq *irq)
> +{
> + irq->hw = false;
> + irq->hwintid = 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
> + u32 vintid)
> +{
> + struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> + int ret;
>
> + BUG_ON(!irq);
> +
> + spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + ret = kvm_vgic_map_irq(vcpu, irq, host_irq);
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> -int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq)
> +int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid)
> {
> struct vgic_irq *irq;
>
> if (!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm))
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> - irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, virt_irq);
> + irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> BUG_ON(!irq);
>
> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> -
> - irq->hw = false;
> - irq->hwintid = 0;
> -
> + kvm_vgic_unmap_irq(irq);
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
>
> @@ -772,9 +802,9 @@ void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
> }
> }
>
> -bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq)
> +bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid)
> {
> - struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, virt_irq);
> + struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> bool map_is_active;
>
> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> --
> 2.14.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-25 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-06 15:33 [PATCH v4 00/26] KVM/ARM: Add support for GICv4 Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 01/26] KVM: arm/arm64: register irq bypass consumer on ARM/ARM64 Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 02/26] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: restructure kvm_vgic_(un)map_phys_irq Marc Zyngier
2017-10-25 14:44 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-10-26 13:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 03/26] KVM: arm: Select ARM_GIC_V3 and ARM_GIC_V3_ITS Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 04/26] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Move kvm_vgic_destroy call around Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 05/26] KVM: arm/arm64: vITS: Add MSI translation helpers Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 06/26] KVM: arm/arm64: vITS: Add a helper to update the affinity of an LPI Marc Zyngier
2017-10-25 14:50 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 07/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add property field and per-VM predicate Marc Zyngier
2017-10-25 14:54 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 08/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add init/teardown of the per-VM vPE irq domain Marc Zyngier
2017-10-25 15:46 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 09/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Wire mapping/unmapping of VLPIs in VFIO irq bypass Marc Zyngier
2017-10-25 15:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 10/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle INT command applied to a VLPI Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 11/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Unmap VLPI when freeing an LPI Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 12/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Propagate affinity changes to the physical ITS Marc Zyngier
2017-10-25 16:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 13/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle CLEAR applied to a VLPI Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 14/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle MOVALL applied to a vPE Marc Zyngier
2017-10-25 16:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 15/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Propagate property updates to VLPIs Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 16/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle INVALL applied to a vPE Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 17/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Propagate VLPI properties at map time Marc Zyngier
2017-10-25 16:48 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-25 17:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-26 8:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 18/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Use pending_last as a scheduling hint Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 19/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add doorbell interrupt handling Marc Zyngier
2017-10-26 14:28 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-26 15:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 20/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Use the doorbell interrupt as an unblocking source Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 21/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Hook vPE scheduling into vgic flush/sync Marc Zyngier
2017-10-26 15:24 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 22/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Enable virtual cpuif if VLPIs can be delivered Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 23/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Prevent a VM using GICv4 from being saved Marc Zyngier
2017-10-26 15:28 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-27 13:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-30 6:48 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 24/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Enable VLPI support Marc Zyngier
2017-10-06 15:34 ` [PATCH v4 25/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Prevent heterogenous systems from using GICv4 Marc Zyngier
2017-10-26 15:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-26 15:48 ` Mark Rutland
2017-10-27 6:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-27 7:37 ` Mark Rutland
2017-10-27 7:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-27 8:04 ` Mark Rutland
2017-10-27 8:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-29 2:16 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-06 15:34 ` [PATCH v4 26/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Theory of operations Marc Zyngier
2017-10-26 15:32 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-08 16:45 ` [PATCH v4 00/26] KVM/ARM: Add support for GICv4 Shanker Donthineni
2017-10-09 17:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-10-09 18:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-19 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 27/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Prevent userspace from changing doorbell affinity Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171025144443.GH91785@lvm \
--to=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).