From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: early_printk: use printascii() rather than printch()
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:53:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171031175344.GJ9463@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YSQ.7.76.1710311346190.21665@knanqh.ubzr>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 01:48:01PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 01:06:35PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > That's easy to veryfy with this patch:
> >
> > Unfortunately not that easy, this patch breaks printch.
>
> Right, missed that.
>
> New patch below:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/debug.S b/arch/arm/kernel/debug.S
> index ea9646cc2a..0d1cef4b6e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/debug.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/debug.S
> @@ -79,25 +79,28 @@ hexbuf: .space 16
>
> ENTRY(printascii)
> addruart_current r3, r1, r2
> - b 2f
> -1: waituart r2, r3
> - senduart r1, r3
> - busyuart r2, r3
> - teq r1, #'\n'
> - moveq r1, #'\r'
> - beq 1b
> -2: teq r0, #0
> +1: teq r0, #0
> ldrneb r1, [r0], #1
> teqne r1, #0
> - bne 1b
> - ret lr
> + reteq lr
> + teq r1, #'\n'
> + bne 2f
> + mov r1, '\r'
> + waituart r2, r3
> + senduart r1, r3
> + busyuart r2, r3
> + mov r1, '\n'
> +2: waituart r2, r3
> + senduart r1, r3
> + busyuart r2, r3
> + b 1b
> ENDPROC(printascii)
>
> ENTRY(printch)
> addruart_current r3, r1, r2
> mov r1, r0
> mov r0, #0
> - b 1b
> + b 2b
> ENDPROC(printch)
Still, not quite! printch('\n') with the old code would do this
(in terms of executed instructions):
mov r1, r0
mov r0, #0
b 1b
1: waituart r2, r3
senduart r1, r3
busyuart r2, r3
teq r1, #'\n'
moveq r1, #'\r'
beq 1b
1: waituart r2, r3
senduart r1, r3
busyuart r2, r3
teq r1, #'\n'
...
2: teq r0, #0
ret lr
So a printch('\n') produces "\n\r" on the UART. If we're fixing
printascii() to emit "\r\n" instead of "\n\r" for a '\n', then
printch() should have the same fix, and should not truncate to
just '\n'.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-31 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-02 2:06 [PATCH 0/3] a few debug_ll fixes and improvements Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-02 2:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: debug.S: move hexbuf to a writable section Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-02 2:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: semihosting: use proper instruction on v7m processors Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-02 2:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: early_printk: use printascii() rather than printch() Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-02 5:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2017-10-02 14:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-31 11:28 ` Chris Brandt
2017-10-31 16:22 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-31 16:38 ` Robin Murphy
2017-10-31 17:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-31 17:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-31 17:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-31 17:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-10-31 18:15 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-31 18:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-31 18:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-31 19:12 ` Chris Brandt
2017-10-31 19:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-31 21:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-31 23:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-31 23:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-02 0:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-02 3:59 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-11-02 4:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-11-02 11:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-02 15:12 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-11-02 11:06 ` Chris Brandt
2017-11-02 11:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-02 11:28 ` Chris Brandt
2017-11-02 13:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-02 15:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-11-02 15:18 ` Robin Murphy
2017-11-02 15:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-02 15:25 ` Chris Brandt
2017-11-02 15:23 ` Chris Brandt
2017-11-02 15:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-11-02 16:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-11-02 16:38 ` Chris Brandt
2017-11-02 17:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-02 17:20 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-11-02 17:28 ` Chris Brandt
2017-11-02 18:29 ` Robin Murphy
2017-11-02 21:46 ` syntax unified, was " Nicolas Pitre
2017-11-02 15:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-02 16:30 ` Chris Brandt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171031175344.GJ9463@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).