From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:12:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v3 18/22] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCMI In-Reply-To: References: <1506604306-20739-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1506604306-20739-19-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20171102072350.GO30645@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20171103151228.GS11011@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/02, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 02/11/17 07:23, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Is there a lot of copy/paste going on from clk-scpi.c? Maybe it > > could be consolidated? > > > > Not much apart from the usual driver skeleton. Also SCPI specification > will not be enhanced any further while SCMI will be. So they will > deviated in the feature set going further. Even I was thinking of > merging then together initially but based on some WIP changes to the > specification, I thought it may not be good idea. But if we think it can > be merged in future , I will do that for sure(for easy maintenance) > Ok, no worries from me. Thanks for taking another look. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project