linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mka@chromium.org (Matthias Kaehlcke)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/15] Add support for clang LTO
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:07:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103180739.GG96615@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171103175156.f44o7kuxgzym3pbt@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>

Hi Mark,

El Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:51:56PM +0000 Mark Rutland ha dit:

> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 10:11:44AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > This series adds build system support for compiling the kernel with clang
> > Link Time Optimization (LTO), using GNU gold with the LLVMgold plug-in
> > for linking. Some background for clang's LTO support is available here:
> > 
> >   https://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html
> > 
> > With -flto, clang produces LLVM bitcode instead of object files, and
> > the compilation to native code happens at link time. In addition, clang
> > cannot use an external assembler for inline assembly when LTO is enabled,
> > which causes further compatibility issues.
> > 
> > The patches in this series remove intermediate linking steps when LTO is
> > used, postpone processing done on object files until after the LTO link
> > step, add workarounds for GNU gold incompatibilities, and address inline
> > assembly incompatibilities for arm64.
> > 
> > These changes allow arm64 defconfig to be compiled with LTO, but other
> > architectures are not enabled until compatibility issues have been
> > addressed. In particular, x86 inline assembly doesn't currently compile
> > with clang's integrated assembler due to this LLVM bug:
> > 
> >   https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24487
> > 
> > Due to recent bug fixes in the toolchain, it's recommended to use clang
> > 5.0 or later, and GNU gold from binutils 2.27 or later
> 
> Which tree are you testing with?

In general upstream should be a good starting point.

> I had a go building the arm64 for/next/core branch defconfig using clang
> 5.0.0 from llvm.org, with the Linaro 17.05 toolchain's binutils
> (2.27.0.20161019), and I hit what appears to be a compiler bug quite
> quickly.
> 
> I had to create an aarch64-linux-gnu-clang wrapper, too. I'm not sure if
> there's build system help to avoid needing that?
> 
> ----
> [mark at lakrids:~/src/linux]% uselinaro 17.05 usellvm 5.0.0 make CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- CC=clang  ARCH=arm64 
> Segmentation fault
> arch/arm64/Makefile:27: ld does not support --fix-cortex-a53-843419; kernel may be susceptible to erratum
> arch/arm64/Makefile:48: Detected assembler with broken .inst;
> disassembly will be unreliable

This should be fixed by https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10039329/
and https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10030583/

Unfortunately we didn't encounter these earlier, in Chrome OS this
was/is hidden by invoking an architecture aware wrapper instead of
bare clang :(

>   CHK     include/config/kernel.release
>   CHK     include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
>   CHK     include/generated/utsrelease.h
>   CHK     include/generated/bounds.h
>   CHK     include/generated/timeconst.h
>   CHK     include/generated/asm-offsets.h
>   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>   CHK     scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.h
>   CHK     include/generated/compile.h
>   CC      arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-cipher.o
> fatal error: error in backend: Do not know how to split the result of this operator!
> 
> clang-5.0: error: clang frontend command failed with exit code 70 (use -v to see invocation)
> clang version 5.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_500/final)
> Target: aarch64--linux-gnu
> Thread model: posix
> InstalledDir: /mnt/data/opt/toolchain/llvm/5.0.0/bin
> clang-5.0: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to http://llvm.org/bugs/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
> clang-5.0: note: diagnostic msg: 
> ********************
> 
> PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT:
> Preprocessed source(s) and associated run script(s) are located at:
> clang-5.0: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/aes-ce-cipher-7850ed.c
> clang-5.0: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/aes-ce-cipher-7850ed.sh
> clang-5.0: note: diagnostic msg: 
> 
> ********************
> scripts/Makefile.build:313: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-cipher.o' failed
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-cipher.o] Error 70
> Makefile:1019: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/crypto' failed
> make: *** [arch/arm64/crypto] Error 2

This is fixed in newer clang versions, otherwise you need

[PATCH 07/15] arm64: use -mno-implicit-float instead of
-mgeneral-regs-only

of this series.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-03 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-03 17:11 [PATCH 00/15] Add support for clang LTO Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 01/15] kbuild: add ld-name macro and support for GNU gold Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 18:24   ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 02/15] kbuild: fix LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION with " Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 03/15] kbuild: add support for clang LTO Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 04/15] kbuild: fix dynamic ftrace with " Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 05/15] scripts/mod: disable LTO for empty.c Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 06/15] efi/libstub: disable clang LTO Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 20:10   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 06/15] efi/libstub: disable LTO Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 07/15] arm64: use -mno-implicit-float instead of -mgeneral-regs-only Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:50   ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-11-03 18:02   ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-03 18:20     ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-11-03 18:31   ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-03 18:52     ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-03 19:06       ` Kees Cook
2017-11-03 20:18         ` Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 08/15] arm64: don't pass -maarch64linux to GNU gold Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 20:41   ` Yury Norov
2017-11-06 16:56     ` Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 09/15] arm64: keep .altinstructions and .altinstr_replacement Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 18:40   ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 10/15] arm64: disable ARM64_ERRATUM_843419 for clang LTO Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 20:13   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-09 18:54     ` Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 11/15] arm64: explicitly pass --no-fix-cortex-a53-843419 to GNU gold Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 11/15] arm64: fix mrs_s/msr_s macros for clang LTO Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 12/15] arm64: add a workaround for GNU gold with ARM64_MODULE_PLTS Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 12/15] arm64: explicitly pass --no-fix-cortex-a53-843419 to GNU gold Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:12 ` [PATCH 13/15] arm64: add a workaround for GNU gold with ARM64_MODULE_PLTS Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 20:09   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-03 20:29     ` Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:12 ` [PATCH 13/15] arm64: fix mrs_s/msr_s macros for clang LTO Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:53   ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-11-03 18:06     ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-03 18:15       ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-11-03 18:38   ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-08  9:25   ` Yury Norov
2017-11-09  0:02     ` Andi Kleen
2017-11-09  4:48       ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2017-11-09 16:51         ` Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-09 16:50       ` Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-09 16:45     ` Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:12 ` [PATCH 14/15] arm64: crypto: disable LTO for aes-ce-cipher.c Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 20:10   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-03 17:12 ` [PATCH 15/15] arm64: select ARCH_SUPPORTS_CLANG_LTO Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 17:51 ` [PATCH 00/15] Add support for clang LTO Mark Rutland
2017-11-03 18:07   ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-11-03 18:29     ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-03 18:36       ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-11-03 18:49         ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-03 18:07   ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2017-11-03 18:09   ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-03 18:11     ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-11-03 19:26       ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-03 19:56         ` Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-04  2:13           ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-09 10:54             ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-11-09 11:03               ` Marc Zyngier
2017-11-09 16:31               ` Sami Tolvanen
2017-11-03 20:23         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-03 18:22   ` Sami Tolvanen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171103180739.GG96615@google.com \
    --to=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).