From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: samitolvanen@google.com (Sami Tolvanen) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:54:57 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 10/15] arm64: disable ARM64_ERRATUM_843419 for clang LTO In-Reply-To: References: <20171103171203.107569-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <20171103171203.107569-12-samitolvanen@google.com> Message-ID: <20171109185457.GA137560@samitolvanen.mtv.corp.google.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 08:13:20PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > I wonder it makes sense to disable such relocations entirely when we > enable this erratum. If the toolchain does not generate them, they > shouldn't occur in the first place, and having this dependency here > seems awkward as well. I agree. Unless someone objects, I'll replace this in v2 with a patch that leaves the relocations in module.c even when the erratum is selected. Sami