From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 07:37:34 -0800
Subject: n900 in next-20170901
In-Reply-To: <20171110064623.GA32442@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
References: <20171109000801.GA23982@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
 <20171109001113.GZ28152@atomide.com>
 <20171109003639.GB23982@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
 <20171109035031.GA24383@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
 <20171109150854.GC28152@atomide.com>
 <20171110001315.GA29669@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
 <20171110032610.GJ28152@atomide.com>
 <20171110061917.GK28152@atomide.com>
 <20171110062340.GL28152@atomide.com>
 <20171110064623.GA32442@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Message-ID: <20171110153734.GP28152@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> [171110 06:43]:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:23:40PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [171109 22:19]:
> > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [171110 03:28]:
> > > > Then I'll follow up on cleaning up save_secure_ram_context later.
> > > 
> > > Here's a better version, the static mapping did not get used.. It
> > > just moved the area so it happened to work. It needs to be set
> > > up as MT_MEMORY_RWX_NONCACHED instead.
> > 
> 
> I see a better version now. Hmm... I guess that it also has the
> problem that I mentioned on first version.
> 
> > And FYI, here's what I currently have for the follow-up patch,
> > but that can wait a bit.
> 
> Okay. So, this patch should be applied on the top of above better version?

Yeah, but we may actually want to combine both patches into a
single patch to avoid the save_secure_ram_context 0xffff translation
limit, see my comments in the first version.

Regards,

Tony