From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn)
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:31:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] net: nb8800: Add support for suspend/resume
In-Reply-To: <80649328-8d2a-0a6f-a025-6a6c4de62d7e@sigmadesigns.com>
References: <230165aa-eaf1-6e2b-7ff3-45b3ee4ffc62@sigmadesigns.com>
 <ae0d528a-d602-f399-9d75-65bf9bbf1264@sigmadesigns.com>
 <yw1xshdh109j.fsf@mansr.com>
 <80649328-8d2a-0a6f-a025-6a6c4de62d7e@sigmadesigns.com>
Message-ID: <20171114163159.GX30830@lunn.ch>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:22:04PM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 14/11/2017 14:02, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> 
> > Missing patch description.  Don't bother though.  I won't approve of
> > this implementation.
> 
> I hope I can convince David that you should not have veto power over
> this driver just because it was you who submitted it upstream first.

In practice, anybody can request a veto on a patch. If a patch
introduces a regression, and somebody reports it, that is pretty much
an automatic veto.

Please work with Mans to ensure you are not breaking the driver for
the hardware he cares about.

    Andrew