linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check result of allocation before use
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:58:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171120145814.GM28855@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171116175821.26544-5-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 05:58:18PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We miss a test against NULL after allocation.
> 
> Fixes: 6d03a68f8054 ("KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Turn device_id validation into generic ID validation")
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org # 4.8
> Reported-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 370086006838..30f7c7e6d2f4 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -821,6 +821,8 @@ static int vgic_its_alloc_collection(struct vgic_its *its,
>  		return E_ITS_MAPC_COLLECTION_OOR;
>  
>  	collection = kzalloc(sizeof(*collection), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!collection)
> +		return -ENOMEM;

Our processing of this return value seems to be "shrug, something went
wrong, let's move on to the next command".  Is this really a valid thing
to do if we're so much under memory pressure that we dannot allocate a
collection structure?

My question notwithstanding:

Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

>  
>  	collection->collection_id = coll_id;
>  	collection->target_addr = COLLECTION_NOT_MAPPED;
> -- 
> 2.14.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-20 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-16 17:58 [PATCH 0/7] KVM/ARM fixes for 4.15-rc1 Marc Zyngier
2017-11-16 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-irqfd: Fix MSI entry allocation Marc Zyngier
2017-11-20 14:49   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-16 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Preserve the revious read from the pending table Marc Zyngier
2017-11-20 14:52   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-16 17:58 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: " Marc Zyngier
2017-11-20 14:56   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-16 17:58 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check result of allocation before use Marc Zyngier
2017-11-20 14:58   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-11-21 11:12     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-11-16 17:58 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v4: Only perform an unmap for valid vLPIs Marc Zyngier
2017-11-20 15:10   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-16 17:58 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: KVM: fix VTTBR_BADDR_MASK BUG_ON off-by-one Marc Zyngier
2017-11-16 17:58 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm: KVM: Fix " Marc Zyngier
2017-11-20 13:29   ` Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171120145814.GM28855@cbox \
    --to=cdall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).