From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 20:25:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 18/18] arm64: select ARCH_SUPPORTS_LTO_CLANG In-Reply-To: <20171120180554.GM32488@arm.com> References: <20171116165922.llrojrvomuihabrt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20171116173417.nqsh5dpu65uj7b5s@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20171116174830.GX3624@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171116183950.GA3624@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171116184508.GC21898@arm.com> <20171116191307.GC3624@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171116201701.GA143965@samitolvanen.mtv.corp.google.com> <20171120180554.GM32488@arm.com> Message-ID: <20171120192531.53z66fhwg4rdjgdc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 06:05:55PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Please don't confuse this with a reluctance to support clang; I'm keen to > see that supported, As an aside; as long as clang doesn't do asm-goto and asm-flag-output (as examples of features that clang lacks and developers have at times stated they would never support) I can't take them serious as a target compiler.