linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/4] arm64/sve: KVM: Ensure user SVE use traps after vcpu execution
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 20:23:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171122192344.GS28855@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510936735-6762-4-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 04:38:54PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> Currently, SVE use can remain untrapped if a KVM vcpu thread is
> preempted inside the kernel and we then switch back to some user
> thread.
> 
> This patch ensures that SVE traps for userspace are enabled before
> switching away from the vcpu thread.

I don't really understand why KVM is any different then any other thread
which could be using SVE that gets preempted?

> 
> In an attempt to preserve some clarity about why and when this is
> needed, kvm_fpsimd_flush_cpu_state() is used as a hook for doing
> this.  This means that this function needs to be called after
> exiting the vcpu instead of before entry: 

I don't understand why the former means the latter?

> this patch moves the call
> as appropriate.  As a side-effect, this will avoid the call if vcpu
> entry is shortcircuited by a signal etc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 2 ++
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c         | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index 3dc8058..3b135eb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -1083,6 +1083,8 @@ void sve_flush_cpu_state(void)
>  
>  	if (last->st && last->sve_in_use)
>  		fpsimd_flush_cpu_state();
> +
> +	sve_user_disable();
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
>  
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 772bf74..554b157 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -651,9 +651,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		 */
>  		preempt_disable();
>  
> -		/* Flush FP/SIMD state that can't survive guest entry/exit */
> -		kvm_fpsimd_flush_cpu_state();
> -
>  		kvm_pmu_flush_hwstate(vcpu);
>  
>  		local_irq_disable();
> @@ -754,6 +751,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		guest_exit();
>  		trace_kvm_exit(ret, kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu), *vcpu_pc(vcpu));
>  
> +		/* Flush FP/SIMD state that can't survive guest entry/exit */
> +		kvm_fpsimd_flush_cpu_state();
> +

Could this be done in kvm_arch_vcpu_put() instead?

>  		preempt_enable();
>  
>  		ret = handle_exit(vcpu, run, ret);
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

Thanks,
-Christoffer

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-22 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-17 16:38 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Initial KVM SVE support hacks Dave Martin
2017-11-17 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] arm64: fpsimd: Abstract out binding of task's fpsimd context to the cpu Dave Martin
2017-11-17 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] arm64/sve: KVM: Avoid dereference of dead task during guest entry Dave Martin
2017-11-22 19:23   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-23 14:16     ` Dave Martin
2017-11-17 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] arm64/sve: KVM: Ensure user SVE use traps after vcpu execution Dave Martin
2017-11-22 19:23   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-11-23 14:34     ` Dave Martin
2017-11-17 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] arm64/sve: KVM: Basic SVE support Dave Martin
2017-11-22 19:23   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-23 18:06     ` Dave Martin
2017-11-23 18:49       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-25 17:48         ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-17 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Initial KVM SVE support hacks Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171122192344.GS28855@cbox \
    --to=cdall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).